2017
DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2016.0098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epiretinal Membrane: Prevalence and Risk Factors from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008 through 2012

Abstract: PurposeTo investigate the prevalence and risk factors for an epiretinal membrane (ERM) in Korean population.MethodsUsing the database of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2008 through 2012, 14,772 participants 40 years of age or older with gradable fundus photographs were included. The presence of ERM was determined by using fundus photographs. The prevalence of ERM was estimated and possible risk factors including systemic factors, nutritional status, and blood tests were analyze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(51 reference statements)
4
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort, although definite ERMs according to retinal photographs were statistically more frequent in men than in women (p = 0.009), the three ERM stages graded according to the SD-OCT images were similarly distributed between the two sexes (p = 0.75, p = 0.50 and p = 0.17 for stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively), which is in line with the findings in most of the above cited studies. Pseudophakia has constantly been associated with a higher ERM prevalence (Appiah & Hirose 1988;Klein et al 1994;Mitchell et al 1997;Fraserbell et al 2003;Fraser-Bell et al 2004;McCarty et al 2005;You et al 2008;Ng et al 2011;Cheung et al 2017;Kim et al 2017). Such a finding can result from two nonexclusive factors.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our cohort, although definite ERMs according to retinal photographs were statistically more frequent in men than in women (p = 0.009), the three ERM stages graded according to the SD-OCT images were similarly distributed between the two sexes (p = 0.75, p = 0.50 and p = 0.17 for stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively), which is in line with the findings in most of the above cited studies. Pseudophakia has constantly been associated with a higher ERM prevalence (Appiah & Hirose 1988;Klein et al 1994;Mitchell et al 1997;Fraserbell et al 2003;Fraser-Bell et al 2004;McCarty et al 2005;You et al 2008;Ng et al 2011;Cheung et al 2017;Kim et al 2017). Such a finding can result from two nonexclusive factors.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New technologies, such as spectraldomain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), allow to detect pathologies of the vitreo-macular interface with high sensitivity and specificity and to differentiate different subtypes (Wilkins et al 1996;Mori et al 2004;Kawasaki et al 2009;Hwang et al 2012;Konidaris et al 2015;Stevenson et al 2016). Previous studies using ophthalmoscopy or fundus photography in general showed a lower prevalence of epiretinal membranes (ERMs) (Mitchell et al 1997;McCarty et al 2005;You et al 2008;Duan et al 2009;Aung et al 2013;Kim et al 2017) and of other pathologies of the vitreomacular interface. In addition, since the introduction of the OCT technology, specific classification of vitreo-macular adhesion (VMA) into a focal and a broad type has been introduced (Duker et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of ERM in the current study was lower than in previous population-based studies using SD-OCT. In the Beaver Dam Eye Study (BDES) [ 7 ], which was conducted in the USA population (mean age 74.1 years, both phakic and pseudophakic), the prevalence of ERM was 34.1% of the enrolled eyes. The Alienor study [ 8 ], which was conducted in the French population (mean age 79.4 years, both phakic and pseudophakic), the prevalence was 69.9% of the enrolled eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ERM is a highly prevalent disease [5,6], the pathophysiology of ERM, especially primary ERM, is not yet fully understood. Known demographic risk factors for the development of primary ERM are age and cataract surgery, which were consistently shown in many large-scale studies [7][8][9][10][11][12]. In a recent longitudinal study using SD-OCT, the development of ERM based on aging was associated with the vitreoretinal interface (VRI), such as vitreomacular or vitreopapillary adhesion at baseline [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation