Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Montane Oak Forests
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-28909-7_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epiphytic Communities of Bryophytes and Macrolichens in a Costa Rican Montane Oak Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tree age and species composition have affected lichen community composition at smaller geographical scales, with narrower ranges of environmental variation observed for a tropical forest (Frisch et al 2015) or temperate forests (Will-Wolf et al 2006). Direct relationships between bark pH and lichen diversity are well documented in other studies (Kuusinen 1996; Herk 2001; Holz 2003; Cáceres et al . 2007; Li et al 2011; Koch et al 2013) that do not focus on disturbance impacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Tree age and species composition have affected lichen community composition at smaller geographical scales, with narrower ranges of environmental variation observed for a tropical forest (Frisch et al 2015) or temperate forests (Will-Wolf et al 2006). Direct relationships between bark pH and lichen diversity are well documented in other studies (Kuusinen 1996; Herk 2001; Holz 2003; Cáceres et al . 2007; Li et al 2011; Koch et al 2013) that do not focus on disturbance impacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Beside Quercus copeyensis and Q. costaricensis, species from the genera Oreopanax, Viburnum, Myrsine, Weinmannia, Cleyera, Styrax, Cornus, and others were present. The overall diversity of epiphytic bryophytes and macrolichens was high with a similar number of species occurring in the three forest stands (168 species in total; Holz 2006). At the stand level, the total epiphyte biomass increased with stand age from 160 kg dryweight ha -1 in ESF to 520 kg ha -1 in MSF and 3,400 kg ha -1 in OGF (Köhler et al 2008).…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…2007). In contrast, S. damicornis has much fewer GBIF entries (508) but exhibits an even wider inferred global distribution pattern (; ); this name is also applied much more frequently to identify green-algal species at a global level, including in the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia (Durand & Pittier 1891; Stizenberger 1895; Hitchcock 1898; Schiffner 1901; Riddle 1912; Merrill 1913; Howe 1914; Plitt 1921; Malme 1934; Welch 1950; Herre 1951; Imshaug 1956; Zahlbruckner 1956; Dix 1957; Thomasson 1959; Choisy 1960; Follmann 1976; Tønsberg 1990; da Silva et al 1990; Wolf 1993; Brodo 1994; Marcano et al 1996; de Oliveira et al 2002; Käffer & Martins 2005; Nayaka & Upreti 2005; Holz 2006; Sipman 2006; Spielmann 2006; Käffer et al 2007, 2009; Cerón & Quintero 2009; Gumboski & Eliasaro 2011; Joshi et al 2011; Martins et al 2011; Rincón-Espitia et al 2011; Benítez et al 2012; Bungartz et al 2013; Mishra & Upreti 2014; Aptroot 2016; Nelson & Sandoval 2018). At times, the concepts of the two species became rather diffuse; thus, both Flörke (1809) and Acharius (1814) considered S. canariensis an infraspecific entity of S. damicornis .
Fig.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%