1984
DOI: 10.2307/1351615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epiphyte-Grazer Relationships in Seagrass Meadows: Consequences for Seagrass Growth and Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
3

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Epiphytes also favour detritus accumulation and amplify surface area for the colonization of bacteria and microalgae (Hacker and Steneck 1990;James and Heck 1994;Leber 1985;Russo 1990), thus beneWting species that consume these food resources (Edgar 1990). In several seagrass ecosystems, algal epiphytes are found to be more attractive food for herbivores than the leaves themselves (Kitting et al 1984;Van Montfrans 1984, Van Montfrans et al 1984). In this study, epiphyte biomass was the factor that had the most direct bearing on diversity and species distribution, either acting alone or in conjunction with other variables like geographical position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Epiphytes also favour detritus accumulation and amplify surface area for the colonization of bacteria and microalgae (Hacker and Steneck 1990;James and Heck 1994;Leber 1985;Russo 1990), thus beneWting species that consume these food resources (Edgar 1990). In several seagrass ecosystems, algal epiphytes are found to be more attractive food for herbivores than the leaves themselves (Kitting et al 1984;Van Montfrans 1984, Van Montfrans et al 1984). In this study, epiphyte biomass was the factor that had the most direct bearing on diversity and species distribution, either acting alone or in conjunction with other variables like geographical position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In the presence of epifaunal grazers, rates of epiphyte biomass accumulation with nutrient enrichment might have been substantially retarded, thereby mollifying inhibitory effects on Potarnogeton perfoliatus growth (e.g. Van Montfrans et al 1984, Cattaneo & Kalff 1986.…”
Section: Plant Growth Responses To Nutrient Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, epiphytes may also have negative effects on their seagrass hosts-creating physical barriers to light absorption (Losee and Wetzel 1983;Dalla Via et al 1998;Brush and Nixon 2002), nutrient uptake, gas exchange, or a combination of these factors (Sand-Jensen 1977;van Montfrans et al 1984;Sand-Jensen et al 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%