2013
DOI: 10.32917/hmj/1372180514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epimorphisms from 2-bridge link groups onto Heckoid groups (I)

Abstract: Riley "defined" the Heckoid groups for 2-bridge links as Kleinian groups, with nontrivial torsion, generated by two parabolic transformations, and he constructed an infinite family of epimorphisms from 2-bridge link groups onto Heckoid groups. In this paper, we make Riley's definition explicit, and give a systematic construction of epimorphisms from 2-bridge link groups onto Heckoid groups, generalizing Riley's construction.In honour of J. Hyam Rubinstein and his contribution to mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For r a rational number and n an integer or a half-integer greater than 1, let C r (2n) be the group of automorphisms of D generated by the parabolic transformation, centered on the vertex r, by 2n units in the clockwise direction, and let Γ(r; n) be the group generated by Γ ∞ and C r (2n). The answer to Question 2.1 obtained in [8,9,10,11], for the general case when r is nonintegral, is given in terms of the action of Γ(r; n) on ∂H 2 =R. The answer to the remaining case when r is an integer is also given in a similar way.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For r a rational number and n an integer or a half-integer greater than 1, let C r (2n) be the group of automorphisms of D generated by the parabolic transformation, centered on the vertex r, by 2n units in the clockwise direction, and let Γ(r; n) be the group generated by Γ ∞ and C r (2n). The answer to Question 2.1 obtained in [8,9,10,11], for the general case when r is nonintegral, is given in terms of the action of Γ(r; n) on ∂H 2 =R. The answer to the remaining case when r is an integer is also given in a similar way.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question originated from Minsky's question [3,Question 5.4], and was completely solved in the series of papers [8,9,10,11] for the generic case when r is non-integral, that is, K(r) is not a trivial knot. See [7] for an overview of these works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let K(r) be the 2-bridge link of slope r ∈ Q and let n be an integer or a half-integer greater than 1. In [9], following Riley's work [19], we introduced the Heckoid group G(r; n) of index n for K(r) as the orbifold fundamental group of the Heckoid orbifold S(r; n) of index n for K(r). The classical Hecke groups introduced in [4] are essentially the simplest Heckoid groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let K(r) be the 2-bridge link of slope r ∈ Q and let n be an integer or a halfinteger greater than 1. In [8], following Riley's work [12], we introduced the Heckoid group G(r; n) of index n for K(r) as the orbifold fundamental group of the Heckoid orbifold S(r; n) of index n for K(r). According to whether n is an integer or a non-integral half-integer, the Heckoid group G(r; n) and the Heckoid orbifold S(r; n) are said to be even or odd.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%