2007
DOI: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.81.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological Survey of Pneumococcus Serotypes in Pediatric Patients with Acute Suppurative Otitis Media

Abstract: To determine the distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes isolated from patients under 6 years of age with acute suppurative otitis media, to calculate the serotype coverage of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and to clarify trends in PCG-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, we conducted a one-year prospective study from April 2005 to March 2006 at 10 medical institutions in Hokkaido, Miyagi, Chiba, Tokyo, Kanagawa, and Mie, Japan. Specimens collected by tympanotomy or myringotomy numbered 856… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As for PISP, their incidence (35%) in this survey of adult RTIs was much lower than that (50.8%) reported in pediatric infections [7][8][9]. The incidence of PRSP (12%) in our present survey was relatively low as Susceptibilities of the 162 strains of P. aeruginosa to 22 antimicrobial agents were analyzed compared with the data (16.9-49.0%) reported in pediatric infections [7][8][9]. This difference is thought to be attributable to the excess use of oral penicillins and cephems for the treatment of children, because the use of fluoroquinolones (except for norfloxacin) is contraindicated in children in Japan.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for PISP, their incidence (35%) in this survey of adult RTIs was much lower than that (50.8%) reported in pediatric infections [7][8][9]. The incidence of PRSP (12%) in our present survey was relatively low as Susceptibilities of the 162 strains of P. aeruginosa to 22 antimicrobial agents were analyzed compared with the data (16.9-49.0%) reported in pediatric infections [7][8][9]. This difference is thought to be attributable to the excess use of oral penicillins and cephems for the treatment of children, because the use of fluoroquinolones (except for norfloxacin) is contraindicated in children in Japan.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Among PSSP, more than 55% are thought to be emr-harboring strains because of their resistance to macrolides (EM, CAM, and AZM) and CLDM and susceptibility to the ketolide TEL. As for PISP, their incidence (35%) in this survey of adult RTIs was much lower than that (50.8%) reported in pediatric infections [7][8][9]. The incidence of PRSP (12%) in our present survey was relatively low as Susceptibilities of the 162 strains of P. aeruginosa to 22 antimicrobial agents were analyzed compared with the data (16.9-49.0%) reported in pediatric infections [7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…As for PISP, their incidence (30%) in this survey of adult RTI was much lower than that (50.8%) reported in pediatric infections. [8][9][10] In general, the antimicrobial susceptibilities of PISP were somewhat lower than those of PSSP: the activities of penicillins, including those combined with β-lactamase inhibitors, against PISP were 8 to 32 times less than those against PSSP; among the cephems, CCL, CFDN, CEZ, CTM, and CMZ showed activities 8 to 16 times less than those against PSSP, while CDTR, CAZ, CTRX, CFPM, CFPN, and CZOP showed 2 to 4 times less activity against PISP than against PSSP; the activities of carbapenems against PISP were 4 times less than those against PSSP. The activities of fl uoroquinolones, glycopeptides, and LZD against PISP were the same as those against PSSP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As for PISP strains, their incidence (35%) in this survey of adult RTI was much lower than that (50.8%) reported in pediatric infections. [10][11][12] In general, we found that the antibacterial susceptibility of PISP was somewhat lower than that of PSSP: the activities of the penicillins (including those combined with β-lactamase inhibitors) against PISP were 8 to 32 times less than those against PSSP. Among the cephems, CCL, CFDN, CEZ, CTM, and CMZ showed 8 to 16 times less activity against PISP than against PSSP, while CDTR, CAZ, CTRX, CFPM, and CZOP showed 2 to 4 times less activity against PISP than against PSSP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] This difference is thought to be attributable to the excessive use of oral penicillins and cephems in the pediatric population, because fl uoroquinolones (except for norfl oxacin) are contraindicated in children. The pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility of PRSP somewhat resembled that of PISP; however, the PRSP strains were substantially susceptible (MIC 90 s ≤0.5 μg/ml) only to IPM, PAPM, TFLX, GFLX, TEL, VCM, and TEIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%