1975
DOI: 10.1136/oem.32.4.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological investigation of the role of family susceptibility and occupational and family histories in the development of byssinosis among workers exposed to flax dust.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many fathers had a history of exposure to dust before their marriage. For example, the means of the average age at the beginning of exposure among many of the examined families (1,4,6,8,9,14,17,25,27,29, 32, 33) were below 21 (table 1). The "apparently" lower prevalence of silicosis among workers with fathers with no history of exposure to silica-bearing dust than those from fathers with a history of exposure (less than 10 years) (table 6) might be because some of the workers in the first group who develop respiratory ailments leave the work and change their jobs, while fewer workers in the latter group would do so because of their family ties with their occupation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many fathers had a history of exposure to dust before their marriage. For example, the means of the average age at the beginning of exposure among many of the examined families (1,4,6,8,9,14,17,25,27,29, 32, 33) were below 21 (table 1). The "apparently" lower prevalence of silicosis among workers with fathers with no history of exposure to silica-bearing dust than those from fathers with a history of exposure (less than 10 years) (table 6) might be because some of the workers in the first group who develop respiratory ailments leave the work and change their jobs, while fewer workers in the latter group would do so because of their family ties with their occupation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%