2016
DOI: 10.14737/journal.aavs/2016/4.8.394.397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological Investigation of Outbreak of Brucellosis at Private Dairy Farm, Central Punjab-Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our study could not find statistically significant association for breed of the animals with brucellosis, the crossbred and exotic cattle have been previously reported to be more prone to the infection as compared to the local/indigenous breeds [49,[56][57][58][59]. Specifically, within the cattle, breeds, i.e., Sahiwal, Cholistani, and crossbred, univariate analysis did not show statistical significance (p > 0.05) with the infection (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our study could not find statistically significant association for breed of the animals with brucellosis, the crossbred and exotic cattle have been previously reported to be more prone to the infection as compared to the local/indigenous breeds [49,[56][57][58][59]. Specifically, within the cattle, breeds, i.e., Sahiwal, Cholistani, and crossbred, univariate analysis did not show statistical significance (p > 0.05) with the infection (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…At the farms level, institutional-owned livestock farms tend to be less susceptible to the infection, maybe because of better screening, culling, hygiene and veterinary health facilitation programs than private livestock farms and a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) has been reported [21,34,39,41], however disagreement does exist [42]. One of the major causes of brucellosis outbreaks especially at private-owned farms is the breach in biosecurity, i.e., the introduction of carrier animals (i.e., most often subclinical infected animals) into the existing herd without prior screening [4,49]. The infection remains unsuspected until abortion storm occurs and/or animals are screened for brucellosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these types of dogs often have access to the rejected flesh from slaughterhouses, butcheries or municipal dumps, dead animal carcasses and remains of livestock, e.g. placentas or aborted fetal material, and also to kitchen leftovers [47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiologic variables influencing brucellosis prevalence have been studied to determine the risk. Higher disease prevalence was correlated with animal genetics as buffaloes, crossbred and exotic cattle have higher rates of brucellosis (23,28,40,57,63). It has been hypothesized that a specific allele on nramp1 in Sahiwal cows increases brucellosis resistance, but data are limited so far (74).…”
Section: Brucellosis In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%