2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-019-1015-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological and Clinical Gender Differences in OCD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the direction of these differences might differ by the specific type ICB: hypersexuality and gambling are more common in men, while compulsive buying is more common in women (30). Analogous differences have been reported for compulsive disorders in people without PD, with women presenting more contamination/cleaning symptoms or eating disorders whereas men more commonly present with sexual and aggressive symptoms (31,32). It remains to be investigated if these differences are due to different disease entities or simply to socially-acceptable gendered behaviors ( Table 1).…”
Section: Sex and Gender Aspects In Non-motor Featuresmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the direction of these differences might differ by the specific type ICB: hypersexuality and gambling are more common in men, while compulsive buying is more common in women (30). Analogous differences have been reported for compulsive disorders in people without PD, with women presenting more contamination/cleaning symptoms or eating disorders whereas men more commonly present with sexual and aggressive symptoms (31,32). It remains to be investigated if these differences are due to different disease entities or simply to socially-acceptable gendered behaviors ( Table 1).…”
Section: Sex and Gender Aspects In Non-motor Featuresmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As noted in Table 2, only a minority (41.3%) of the SNMHS respondents who endorsed at least one OCD diagnostic stem question went on to meet full DSM-IV criteria for lifetime OCD in the CIDI. But that resulted in a lifetime prevalence estimate (11.2%) that was much higher than estimates based on previous community epidemiological surveys (Mathes, Morabito, & Schmidt, 2019;Ruscio, Stein, Chiu, & Kessler, 2010), leading us to launch a clinical reappraisal study to evaluate CIDI diagnoses against diagnoses based on blinded clinical follow-up interviews. We attempted to administer a SCID OCD clinical reappraisal interview by telephone for this purpose to a probability sample of 50 SNMHS respondents who met lifetime DSM-IV/CIDI criteria for OCD and a probability sample of 25 SNMHS respondents who had positive diagnostic stem question responses but were classified by the CIDI as not having lifetime OCD.…”
Section: The Clinical Reappraisal Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant variables from Supplementary Table 1 and those non-significant but believed to be relevant factors from past experience (gender, education level) (24,25) were all included in the multivariate logistic regression model; finally, as listed in Table 3, several variables were identified as predictors for OCD. Compared to the married, the respondents who were single were at 1.836 times the risk of having OCD (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Predictors For Ocdmentioning
confidence: 99%