2016
DOI: 10.3791/52646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. Part III. Virus Detection by RT-qPCR

Abstract: EPA Method 1615 measures enteroviruses and noroviruses present in environmental and drinking waters. This method was developed with the goal of having a standardized method for use in multiple analytical laboratories during monitoring period 3 of the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule. Herein we present the protocol for extraction of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) from water sample concentrates and for quantitatively measuring enterovirus and norovirus concentrations using reverse transcription-quantitative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As one of the virus that is generally transmitted by the fecal‐oral route, PV surveillance in the stool specimens cannot be ignored. Some of environmental surveillances of PV in water and sewage have been described previously in Brazil, Israel, Japan, Poland, Spain, and USA [Bosch et al, ; Sinclair et al, ; Nakamura et al, ; de et al, ; Fout et al, ] and the detection rates of PV varied from 2.0% to 5.7%. The prevalence of PV in environmental water in Thailand was comparable to that obtained in other countries at 2.0% [Kittigul et al, ; Tansuphasiri et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As one of the virus that is generally transmitted by the fecal‐oral route, PV surveillance in the stool specimens cannot be ignored. Some of environmental surveillances of PV in water and sewage have been described previously in Brazil, Israel, Japan, Poland, Spain, and USA [Bosch et al, ; Sinclair et al, ; Nakamura et al, ; de et al, ; Fout et al, ] and the detection rates of PV varied from 2.0% to 5.7%. The prevalence of PV in environmental water in Thailand was comparable to that obtained in other countries at 2.0% [Kittigul et al, ; Tansuphasiri et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, environmental surveillance of PV is an additional choice for monitoring PV strains circulating in the population [Kuryk et al, ]. Epidemiological study of PV infection has been focused mainly on the AFP cases and only few studies have been investigated for the PV in environmental sources [Kittigul et al, ; Tansuphasiri et al, ; Bosch et al, ; Sinclair et al, ; Kuryk et al, ; Nakamura et al, ; de et al, ; Fout et al, ]. In Thailand, only few reports of PV detection in environmental water and sewage have been described [Kittigul et al, ; Tansuphasiri et al, ] and there is no data available for PV surveillance in children with diarrhea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactions were processed in a 7900HT Fast real-time PCR system (Life Technologies, Inc.) at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. To enumerate EV in wastewater samples, custom-made Armored RNA (Asuragen, Austin, TX), described in EPA method 1615 (57), was used to generate a standard curve. The custom Armored RNA was made from a construct described previously (44) containing a 195-nucleotide (nt) sequence of the 5= untranslated region that is amplified by the primer and probe assay, along with 96-nt and 89-nt sequences of the norovirus ORF1-ORF2 region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantities of target sequences extracted at each dilution were determined by RT-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR; described below). Linear regression analysis of the standard curve was used to determine concentrations of EV in wastewater samples; standard curves exhibited amplification efficiency of at least 80% and R 2 values of Ն0.97 (57).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These, along with those located in limestone and crystalline (fractured bedrock) settings are likely to have higher virus concentrations than in other settings 8,15,16 . USEPA virus methods specify sampling volumes of 200 L (ICR) to 300 L (Method 1615) of surface water and 1,000 L (ICR) to 1,500 L (Method 1615) of groundwater 17,18 . However, even with the use of large sample volumes, most surface and ground water samples are negative for virus 8,11,19,20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%