2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1656(01)00315-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymes and chelating agent in cotton pretreatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the bio scouring of cotton was significantly improved using combinations of alkaline pectinase and neutral cellulose/alkaline protease/alkaline xylanase in comparison with individual enzymes [8]. Another mixture of enzymes for scouring of cotton fabrics has been applied using mixture of commercial cellulase, hemicellulose, pectinase and xylanase enzymes [9].…”
Section: Scouringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the bio scouring of cotton was significantly improved using combinations of alkaline pectinase and neutral cellulose/alkaline protease/alkaline xylanase in comparison with individual enzymes [8]. Another mixture of enzymes for scouring of cotton fabrics has been applied using mixture of commercial cellulase, hemicellulose, pectinase and xylanase enzymes [9].…”
Section: Scouringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recent usage of cellulase in the production of ethanol for fuel has lead to decrease the production of carbon dioxide by 90% in the fuels [5]. Also used in the cotton pre-treatment in the textile industries [10] …”
Section: Flexible and Heavily Glycosylated Linker Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantages of scouring with sodium hydroxide have motivated textile industry to introduce more enhanced biological agents which would be as effective in removing non-cellulose substances as sodium hydroxide but would not have damaging effects on cellulose and would be less water and energy consuming. Favourable effects of scouring have been obtained with the enzymes pectinases (Buchert, Pere, Puolaka, & Pertti, 2000;Csiszar et al, 2001), which catalyse the hydrolysis of pectin substances. The potential advantages that make the enzyme scouring commercially appealing are a higher quality of the fibres, less wastewaters with lower biological oxygen demand (BOD5), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total organic carbon (TOC), lower process time, cotton weight loss and harshness to handle, economy of energy and compatibility with other procedures, equipment and materials (Cavaco-Paulo & Gübitz, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%