1993
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199301000-00036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay for Anti-Hla Antibodies—an Alternative to Panel Studies by Lymphocytotoxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients awaiting renal transplantation are routinely tested for lymphocytotoxic panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), and graft allocation depends on the current T-and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches. Much effort has been spent on increasing the sensitivity of the crossmatch assay such that weak anti-HLA sensitization can be detected (2,3), and new techniques for pretransplant antibody testing based on highly sensitive, strictly HLA-specific ELISAs have been developed (4,5). But up to now, no study has permitted evaluation of the clinical impact of donor-specific antibodies against HLA antigens (DSA) identified before transplantation by sensitive techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients awaiting renal transplantation are routinely tested for lymphocytotoxic panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), and graft allocation depends on the current T-and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches. Much effort has been spent on increasing the sensitivity of the crossmatch assay such that weak anti-HLA sensitization can be detected (2,3), and new techniques for pretransplant antibody testing based on highly sensitive, strictly HLA-specific ELISAs have been developed (4,5). But up to now, no study has permitted evaluation of the clinical impact of donor-specific antibodies against HLA antigens (DSA) identified before transplantation by sensitive techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…due to autoreactive antibodies against lymphocyte surface molecules (6). In recent years, cell-independent ELISA-or flow cytometry-based assay systems, which permit HLAspecific alloantibody screening, have been developed (7)(8)(9). For [IgG]FlowPRA screening, a flow-cytometric technique for anti-HLA (class I or II) IgG antibody detection, a particularly high sensitivity and specificity has been reported (9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An informed consent of the individuals participating in the study was obtained and all institutional ethics requirements were met. Every three months, all patients waiting for a kidney transplant send us a serum sample and we study it by CDC and/or ELISA methods [14][15][16]. The CDC assay was performed on a panel of T (or total) lymphocytes from 40 donors selected from a panel of HLA typed, peripheral blood lymphocytes, to be representative of HLA-A,-B and -C antigen frequencies in our population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%