2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11694-021-00952-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme inhibitory, antioxidant activity and phytochemical analysis of essential oil from cultivated Rosmarinus officinalis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9] Additionally, we identified camphor, αpinene, and 1,8-cineole as the primary constituents of R. officinalis EO in our study, with percentages of 34.1 %, 18 %, and 10.8 %, respectively. Our findings align with the research conducted by Ouknin and colleagues, [29] where 1,8-cineole, αpinene, and camphor were identified as the primary components in R. officinalis EO extracted from Rosmarinus officinalis L. However, there are slight variations in the percentages compared to our present study. Specifically, they reported 1,8cineole at 27.6 %, α-pinene at 26.6 %, and camphor at 4.5 %.…”
Section: Chemical Profiles Of Eossupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[9] Additionally, we identified camphor, αpinene, and 1,8-cineole as the primary constituents of R. officinalis EO in our study, with percentages of 34.1 %, 18 %, and 10.8 %, respectively. Our findings align with the research conducted by Ouknin and colleagues, [29] where 1,8-cineole, αpinene, and camphor were identified as the primary components in R. officinalis EO extracted from Rosmarinus officinalis L. However, there are slight variations in the percentages compared to our present study. Specifically, they reported 1,8cineole at 27.6 %, α-pinene at 26.6 %, and camphor at 4.5 %.…”
Section: Chemical Profiles Of Eossupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Pre-flowering resulted in the highest essential oil content (1.68%) which was 16% and 20% higher than mid-flowering and post-flowering, respectively (Figure 2). When comparing these essential oil content findings with the earlier studies, diverse results were found, such as 2.73%-3.30% (Dzięcioł, 2021), 0.72%-1.73% (Afshar et al, 2021), 1.25%-1.38% (Oualdi et al, 2021), 1.5% (Aouadi et al, 2021), 2.8% (Ouknin et al, 2021), 0.5% (Karadağ et al, 2022), 1.35% (Elyemni et al, 2022), 1.35%-1.60% (Xylia et al, 2022). In Southern Iran, Afshar et al (2021) reported that rosemary essential oil content began to increase in August and peaked (1.73%) at the beginning of the cold season (November), and following that the accumulation of essential oil production gradually decreased, reaching its lowest point in February (0.72%).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Essential Oilmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The higher concentrations of K, Ca, Mg, Fe, and Na in rosemary make it a highly suitable choice for human health and animal feed, serving as a naturally safe food material to prevent micronutrient deficiency (Ali et al, 2021;Tahri et al, 2013). Furthermore, Ouknin's study did not only verify the existence of the above minerals but also successfully analyzed the mineral compositions of three parts of cultivated R. officinalis, and the informative results unambiguously disclosed the significant differences in mineral contents in various parts of R. officinalis (Ouknin et al, 2021), which may be attributed to the nutrient absorption pathway and capability of different rosemary parts.…”
Section: Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 96%