2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.03.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme-free glucose sensor based on layer-by-layer electrodeposition of multilayer films of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and Cu-based metal framework modified glassy carbon electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the sample I was chosen for further studies by chronoamperometry, and the typical CA curve recorded during consecutive additions of D-glucose aliquots to 0.1 M NaOH at potentials of 0.55 V presented on Figure 6 c. The linear range of dependence of the Faraday current on the D-glucose concentration lies between 1 µM and 3 mM, wherein sensitivity and the limit of detection (LOD) were equal to 8.95 µA/mM and 0.26 µM, respectively. Thereby, sodium salt I exhibits sensor properties comparable with those of another copper-based MOFs known from the literature [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Table 5 presents the comparison between fabricated glucose sensor and other recently reported ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the sample I was chosen for further studies by chronoamperometry, and the typical CA curve recorded during consecutive additions of D-glucose aliquots to 0.1 M NaOH at potentials of 0.55 V presented on Figure 6 c. The linear range of dependence of the Faraday current on the D-glucose concentration lies between 1 µM and 3 mM, wherein sensitivity and the limit of detection (LOD) were equal to 8.95 µA/mM and 0.26 µM, respectively. Thereby, sodium salt I exhibits sensor properties comparable with those of another copper-based MOFs known from the literature [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Table 5 presents the comparison between fabricated glucose sensor and other recently reported ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The linear range of dependence of the Faraday current on the D-glucose concentration lies between 1 µM and 3 mM, wherein sensitivity and the limit of detection (LOD) were equal to 8.95 µA/mM and 0.26 µM, respectively. Thereby, sodium salt I exhibits sensor properties comparable with those of another copperbased MOFs known from the literature [30][31][32][33]. Table 5 presents the comparison between fabricated glucose sensor and other recently reported ones.…”
Section: Sensor Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3.3. Selectivity, stability, and reproducibility of the Au-SWCNHs/Au electrodes To evaluate the selectivity of the Au-SWCNHs/Au electrode, we examined the effects of interfering substances like ascorbic acid (AA), uric acid (UA), dopamine (DA), galactose, lactose, sucrose, which typically coexist with glucose in human serum [29]. Therefore, we tested the Au-SWCNHs/Au electrode in a solution where the molar ratio of glucose to each interfering substance was 10:1.…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterization Of the Au-swcnhs/au Eletrodementioning
confidence: 99%