1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-1281(11)80181-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme activity patterns of myosin ATPase, α-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase and succinate dehydrogenase within different muscle fibre types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) and therefore higher mitochondrial densities. This is in agreement with a previous study using the rat tibialis anterior muscle [78]. Type IIB fibers in the deep regions of the plantaris, extensor digitorum longus, and tibialis anterior muscles have lower oxidative enzyme activities than type I and type IIA fibers in the respective muscle regions.…”
Section: Fiber Type and Oxidative Enzyme Activity In Hindllimb Mussupporting
confidence: 93%
“…4) and therefore higher mitochondrial densities. This is in agreement with a previous study using the rat tibialis anterior muscle [78]. Type IIB fibers in the deep regions of the plantaris, extensor digitorum longus, and tibialis anterior muscles have lower oxidative enzyme activities than type I and type IIA fibers in the respective muscle regions.…”
Section: Fiber Type and Oxidative Enzyme Activity In Hindllimb Mussupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result contrasts with previous studies [11][12][13] where large variations in SDH activity were observed in fibers within the same fiber types in the tibialis anterior muscle of mice and rats, but it is in agreement with another study using the tibialis anterior muscle of rats [14] although that study [14] did not examine the enzyme activity of fibers in different muscle regions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In contrast, myofibers in skeletal muscles can be classified as MHC-1, MHC-2A, MHC-2X/2D, and MHC-2B based on differences in myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms using methods such as electrophoresis and immunohistological staining 28 , 29 ) and as types I, IIA, IIB, and IID (X), depending on the difference in myosin ATPase activity, using the myosin ATPase staining method 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ) . Moreover, succinate dehydrogenase staining and nicotinamide tetrazolium reductase staining are known to classify myofibers as types I and II 34 , 35 ) . These identification methods are based on differences in MHC isoforms or mitochondrial enzyme activity, and no other method that identifies the type of myofibers has previously been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%