2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2012.00790.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic interactions between Gremmeniella abietina var. abietina, European race, and two resistant hosts, Pinus banksiana and P. contorta

Abstract: Summary Ultrastructural observations showed that the European race of Gremmeniella abietina var. abietina can secrete several cell wall–degrading enzymes that help the invasion of Pinus banksiana and P. contorta shoot tip tissues. Alterations in the content or distribution of cellulose were obvious, indicating that colonization might be achieved primarily through the action of glucanases. Polygalacturonases seemed more abundant in the cortex and the phloem of the stem, suggesting they are among the first enzym… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding G. abietina infections, both physical and chemical reactions in inoculated trees have been reported in previous studies. According to these previous studies, the host's resistance to G. abietina infection is likely to be related to: (i) production of ligno‐suberized tissues that help the tree compartmentalize the invaded tissues, and (ii) secretion of molecules such as phenolic compounds capable of degrading or altering the extracellular sheath of the pathogen, which contains chitin, galactose, proteins and lipids (Simard et al ., , ; Laflamme et al ., ; Bernhold et al ., ). Nevertheless, to the authors' knowledge, there are no studies comparing the concentration of phenolic compounds in trees showing differential susceptibility to G. abietina infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding G. abietina infections, both physical and chemical reactions in inoculated trees have been reported in previous studies. According to these previous studies, the host's resistance to G. abietina infection is likely to be related to: (i) production of ligno‐suberized tissues that help the tree compartmentalize the invaded tissues, and (ii) secretion of molecules such as phenolic compounds capable of degrading or altering the extracellular sheath of the pathogen, which contains chitin, galactose, proteins and lipids (Simard et al ., , ; Laflamme et al ., ; Bernhold et al ., ). Nevertheless, to the authors' knowledge, there are no studies comparing the concentration of phenolic compounds in trees showing differential susceptibility to G. abietina infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All processes of destruction of the plant cell wall take place with involvement of various fungal enzyme systems, therefore, these are highly favored targets of mycological (Floudas et al 2012(Floudas et al , 2015Rytioja et al 2014) and phytopathological research (Przybył et al 2006;Simard et al 2013). Certain fungi cause a transition type of decay (Redhead and Ginns 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%