2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose nanoplatelets as a source of sugars with the concomitant production of cellulose nanofibrils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the parenchyma used to obtain sugars had no pretreatment, a high conversion of the biomass was achieved. e obtained percentage of hydrolysis was similar to that reported by other authors using Agave species [11,13,32]. As previously demonstrated, parenchyma was easier to hydrolyze than fibers due to its greater surface area.…”
Section: Enzymatic Hydrolysis Of the Parenchymasupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the parenchyma used to obtain sugars had no pretreatment, a high conversion of the biomass was achieved. e obtained percentage of hydrolysis was similar to that reported by other authors using Agave species [11,13,32]. As previously demonstrated, parenchyma was easier to hydrolyze than fibers due to its greater surface area.…”
Section: Enzymatic Hydrolysis Of the Parenchymasupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It has to be noted that fibers were thoroughly washed before Penicillium was inoculated, avoiding the presence of any carbon source other than cellulose; therefore, it seems unlikely that the fungus produced alternative hydrolytic enzymes. e nanocellulose and parenchyma are known to be easier to hydrolyze as compared to fibers due to their lower crystallinity and small size that increases surface area and enzymes contact with the substrate, thus causing greater hydrolysis [13]. e slight differences in enzymatic activities between using either nanocellulose or parenchyma may be related by the structural differences among both carbon sources.…”
Section: Agave Salmiana Leaves As a Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the specific context of NC production, the common pH range is 4–5.8, with only a few exceptions; both Li et al [ 46 ] and Paakko et al [ 63 ] already reported the utilization of a pH of 7. This range of pH values is especially relevant for the cases when enzymatic treatment is preceded by an alkaline [ 11 , 101 ] or acidic [ 65 , 102 ] treatment, intended for hemicellulose/lignin removal, or the first step of NC production; this would require intensive washing and/or pH adjustment (e.g., dialysis) prior to the addition of enzymes.…”
Section: Nanocellulose Production By Enzymatic Hydrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%