2017
DOI: 10.1002/bab.1560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic characterization and functional implication of two structurally different isocitrate dehydrogenases from Xylella fastidiosa

Abstract: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is a key enzyme at the critical junction between the tricarboxylic acid cycle and the glyoxylate cycle. Most bacteria have only one IDH, while a few contain two IDH isozymes. The coexistence of two different type IDHs in one organism was little known. Xylella fastidiosa is a nutritionally fastidious plant pathogen that contains two structurally different IDHs, an NAD -dependent homodimeric IDH (diXfIDH) and an NADP -dependent monomeric IDH (monoXfIDH). Kinetic characterization sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, even though the H 604 L/R 615 D/R 664 S mutant enzyme could utilize NAD + as the coenzyme, the catalytic efficiency was fairly low. Similar results were obtained in other studies that sought to convert the coenzyme dependence of IDH from NADP + to NAD + , such as for M. methylutens IDH (Wang et al, 2020), X. fastidiosa IDH (Lv et al, 2018), and X. campestris IDH (Lv et al, 2016) (Supplementary Table S2). These results indicated that additional amino acid residues are involved in the binding of NAD + by monomeric IDHs, and further imply that the mechanisms involved in NAD + catalysis are more complex than those involved in NADP + catalysis in the type III IDH subfamily.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, even though the H 604 L/R 615 D/R 664 S mutant enzyme could utilize NAD + as the coenzyme, the catalytic efficiency was fairly low. Similar results were obtained in other studies that sought to convert the coenzyme dependence of IDH from NADP + to NAD + , such as for M. methylutens IDH (Wang et al, 2020), X. fastidiosa IDH (Lv et al, 2018), and X. campestris IDH (Lv et al, 2016) (Supplementary Table S2). These results indicated that additional amino acid residues are involved in the binding of NAD + by monomeric IDHs, and further imply that the mechanisms involved in NAD + catalysis are more complex than those involved in NADP + catalysis in the type III IDH subfamily.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Kinetic studies revealed that PtIDH2 is a completely NADP +specific IDH. Moreover, the K m of PtIDH2 for NADP + (37.4 μM) was slightly higher than those of typical monomeric NADP-IDHs such as X. campestris IDH (17.5 μM) (Lv et al, 2016), A. vinelandii IDH (5.8 μM) (Tsubouchi and Takada, 2019), S. avermitilis IDH (5.0 μM) (Wang et al, 2011), C. glutamicum IDH (4.0 μM) (Chen and Yang, 2000), and X. fastidiosa IDH (1.0 μM) (Lv et al, 2018), but lower than that of the homodimeric IDH from A. baumannii (94.0 μM) (Wang et al, 2018) (Supplementary Table S2). This indicates that the affinity of PtIDH2 for NADP + is lower than that of monomeric NADP-IDHs, but higher than that of the homodimeric NADP-IDHs of the type III subfamily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Particularly, the genes encoding rate-limiting enzymes: pyruvate kinase, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, isocitrate dehydrogenase [NADP] were down-regulated as well (Table 5 , Tables S6A,B ). The genetic mutation of these rate-limiting enzymes can reduce amino acid metabolism levels (Heneka et al, 2001 ; Malay et al, 2005 ; Gupta and Bamezai, 2010 ; Grace et al, 2015 ; Lv et al, 2017 ), indicating that the amino acid metabolism was suppressed after melatonin treatment. Collectively, the results and observations from the transcriptome suggest that amino acid metabolism of P. infestans is likely the main target of melatonin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early phylogenetic analysis and competition experiments have demonstrated that NAD + dependence is an ancestral trait, NADP + dependence by bacterial IDHs is an adaptive trait, and the alteration of the coenzyme specificity is an adaptive result [ 45 ]. For IDHs of the type I subfamily, the coenzyme specificity can be completely converted from NAD + to NADP + , such as Xylella fastidiosa NAD-IDH and Pyrococcus furiosus NAD-IDH [ 31 , 46 ], or from NADP + to NAD + , such as E. coli NADP-IDH [ 47 ]. Interestingly, the evolutionary mechanism may be common for all members of type II IDHs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%