2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzymatic activities in constructed wetlands and di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) biodegradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that almost all the microbial indicators in down-flow cells were higher than those in up-flow ones, especially for the plots fed with DW, which was consistent to other reports [19,34]. It might be attributed to the higher nutrient availability in top layer of down-flow cell [36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was found that almost all the microbial indicators in down-flow cells were higher than those in up-flow ones, especially for the plots fed with DW, which was consistent to other reports [19,34]. It might be attributed to the higher nutrient availability in top layer of down-flow cell [36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Microbial abundances, enzyme activities, and potentials of nitrification and denitrification were widely employed as informative indicators for elucidating status of microbial ecology and ecosystem processes in CWs due to their sensitivity to environmental variations and well correlation with contaminant removal function [5,10,33,34]. Most parameters characterizing microbial activities were positively related to the abundances of cultivable microbes significantly, especially bacteria (Table 2), suggesting the consistency of microbial quantity and activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The permanganate oxidizable C (KMnO 4 -C) was estimated using the method reported by Vieira [11]. Catalase activity (CAT) was assayed using titration method as described by Zhou [12], while dehydrogenase (DEH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), β-glucosidase (GLU), arylsulphatase (ARY) and urease (URE) activities were determined as reported by Tabatabai [13].…”
Section: B Soil Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five representative rhizosphere samples were collected from five target plants in each flow-chamber (DFC, UFC and HFC) and homogenized well to make a composite sample once in every two months from mid-March 2012 to mid-January 2013 [9,24]. After all litter was removed, the field-moist samples were sieved (10 mm for steel slag and zeolite; 15 mm for gravel) and stored in a refrigerator at 4˚C for analysis of enzyme activities.…”
Section: Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just like soil, substrates in CWs are also a living dynamic system including many free enzymes, immobilized extra-cellular enzymes, and enzymes within microbial cells [8]. These intra-cellular or extra-cellular enzymes catalyze the decomposition of macro-molecular pollutants into assimilable lowmolecular moieties [9,10], and some enzymes, such as protease, urease, nitrate reductase (NR), and phosphatase (PP), are widely distributed and related to nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in CWs [8]. Enzyme activity is proposed to be one of the pivotal determinants for water quality amelioration in wetland systems [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%