Environmental Tolerance, Heterogeneity, and the Evolution of Reversible Plastic Responses

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity is a key factor for the success of organisms in heterogeneous environments. Although many forms of phenotypic plasticity can be induced and retracted repeatedly, few extant models have analyzed conditions for the evolution of reversible plasticity. We present a general model of reversible plasticity to examine how plastic shifts in the mode and breadth of environmental tolerance functions (that determine relative fitness) depend on time lags in response to environmental change, the pattern of individual exposure to inducing and noninducing environments, and the quality of available information about the environment. We couched the model in terms of prey-induced responses to variable predation regimes. With longer response lags relative to the rate of environmental change, the modes of tolerance functions in both the presence or absence of predators converge on a generalist strategy that lies intermediate between the optimal functions for the two environments in the absence of response lags. Incomplete information about the level of predation risk in inducing environments causes prey to have broader tolerance functions even at the cost of reduced maximal fitness. We give a detailed analysis of how these factors and interactions among them select for joint patterns of mode and breadth plasticity.

Individual plastic responses by males to rivals reveal mismatches between behaviour and fitness outcomes

“…For instance, males encountering a rival in two out of three exposures experienced higher levels of competition on average, and may hence have invested more than those encountering a rival in one out of three exposures. In addition, it has been proposed that early experiences set behavioural tendencies, reducing the flexibility of a trait over time [4,8]. Our data suggest that behaviour remains flexible, but more strongly so in response to increasing levels of competition.…”

Does coping style predict optimization? An experimental test in a wild passerine bird

“…Those findings lead to the question of which conditions maintain variation in exploratory variation in natural populations [56]. The answer to this question might lie in the notion that reactive behaviour is expected to be favoured only in conditions where the benefits of phenotypic plasticity outweigh its costs [57,58], such as predictably varying environments [59], whereas proactive behaviour should be favoured when the environment is stable [60,61]. In line with this idea, recent theoretical modelling implies that spatio-temporal variation in the availability and predictability of resources can favour the maintenance of proactive and reactive individuals in the same population [62,63].…”

Induced tolerance expressed as relaxed behavioural threat response in millimetre-sized aquatic organisms

“…Moreover, in a continuously variable environment plasticity in behaviour is often crucial for individual performance and fitness [30]. Even though it is clear that behaviour is important, many conceptual rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc.…”