2007
DOI: 10.1080/00207540701472694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework consisted of seven environmental categories consisting of thirty variables. Lu et al (2007) proposed a framework for evaluating the environmental performance of suppliers with respect to the main criteria materials, energy using, solid residues, liquid residues, and gaseous residues. Tuzkaya et al (2009) built a framework for evaluating suppliers against six main environmental criteria and 31 sub-criteria.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The framework consisted of seven environmental categories consisting of thirty variables. Lu et al (2007) proposed a framework for evaluating the environmental performance of suppliers with respect to the main criteria materials, energy using, solid residues, liquid residues, and gaseous residues. Tuzkaya et al (2009) built a framework for evaluating suppliers against six main environmental criteria and 31 sub-criteria.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the definition of critical suppliers/materials used to prioritize efforts has been based solely on the size of the emissions. However, it may also be about characterizing suppliers or materials based on the likelihood of risk exposure, energy using, solid residues, liquid residues, and gaseous residues (Lu et al 2007). Further refinement of the definition of critical suppliers is recommended to include more factors and avoid confusion in purchasing function.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When various papers on decision analysis were compared, it is found that several papers cross-referenced fuzzy set theory and rough set theory with artificial intelligence techniques [3,23]. Additionally, various papers discuss fuzzy set theory as an individual methodology in decision making [85][86][87], while the vast majority of papers integrates fuzzy approaches into multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) [88][89][90][91][92][93][94]. This paper examines fuzzy sets as one of the decision analysis tools, and divided these approaches into the sub-techniques depicted in Figure 14.…”
Section: Quantitative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DMT is constituted from three academicians, Manager of purchasing department and his team consisted of eight purchasing specialist. After completing this phase, criteria are determined by interview sessions done with DMT and considering the related literature conducted before (especially it has been referred to the studies prepared by Lee et al (2009), Lu et al (2007, Nakashima et al (2006), Tsoulfas and Pappis (2006), Tsoulfas and Pappis (2008)). For elimination of criteria the decision making team had a final meeting with the participation of sales manager, public relationsh ips manager and franchising network responsible.…”
Section: Application Of Proposed Approach: a Case Study For Environmementioning
confidence: 99%