2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2014.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
194
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 364 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
12
194
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This framework proved to be useful in analyzing the price dynamics of EU ETS. Nesta et al (2014) instead carry out an empirical analysis on OECD countries to show that also environmental policies based on subsidies perform better when conducted in competitive markets. These works actually motivate the joint implementation of environmental and competition policies.…”
Section: The Optimal Choice Of Environmental Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework proved to be useful in analyzing the price dynamics of EU ETS. Nesta et al (2014) instead carry out an empirical analysis on OECD countries to show that also environmental policies based on subsidies perform better when conducted in competitive markets. These works actually motivate the joint implementation of environmental and competition policies.…”
Section: The Optimal Choice Of Environmental Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has shown that an appropriate policy mix that combines policies to reduce pollution 1 An evaluation of the welfare effects of REPs is beyond the scope of this paper. In general, these policies appear to have a positive effect on RE technologies (Johnstone et al, 2010), with a remarkably stronger effect on highquality inventions (Nesta et al, 2014) and a weaker one on per-capita investments in renewable capacity, which is a proxy for technology diffusion (Popp et al, 2011). Moreover, the various policy instruments have displayed heterogeneous effects across various technologies (Johnstone et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We resort to such indicator due to the difficulty of building more complex numerical measures of environmental policy stringency which cover a wide range of different policy instrument. While very crude, similar proxies have been used in the literature (see for instance Nesta et al 2014) and arguably capture a signal given to investors that governments are committing to tackling energy efficiency by increasing the complexity of the policy portfolio. Tables 1 and 2 For our empirical estimation we compute energy expenditures using information on energy price indexes and energy consumption.…”
Section: Data and Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%