1998
DOI: 10.1108/13598549810230877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental performance indicators for integrated supply chains: the case of Xerox Ltd

Abstract: The integrated supply chain at Xerox Ltd is a large complex organisation which has many potential impacts on the environment. In order to better understand and reduce those impacts, an environmental bias has been introduced into the decision making process which allows more environmentally conscious decisions to be made. This paper details how the environmental bias was developed and how it can be used to provide both a measure of environmental performance for the whole supply chain, each functional element wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fawcett et al [25] were among the first to suggest that measurement systems should extend competitive strategy into the areas of supply chain integration (upstream) and to align with customer requirements (downstream). In areas such as new product development [70], quality [54] and the environment [61] the use of performance measures is seen as an important requirement. Beamon [5], reviewing previous supply chain design models, suggests that the most used competitive priorities were cost (and hybrids of cost: with time, or with customer responsiveness), followed by customer responsiveness and flexibility.…”
Section: Inter-organisational Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fawcett et al [25] were among the first to suggest that measurement systems should extend competitive strategy into the areas of supply chain integration (upstream) and to align with customer requirements (downstream). In areas such as new product development [70], quality [54] and the environment [61] the use of performance measures is seen as an important requirement. Beamon [5], reviewing previous supply chain design models, suggests that the most used competitive priorities were cost (and hybrids of cost: with time, or with customer responsiveness), followed by customer responsiveness and flexibility.…”
Section: Inter-organisational Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set of initiatives falls under the concept of Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) (NEETF, 2001). Research on SSCM has primarily focused on environmental aspects of manufacturing industries (Green et al, 1998;Handfield et al, 2005;McIntyre et al, 1998;Min and Galle, 2001;NEETF, 2001;Preuss, 2005;Rao, 2005;Young and Kielkiewicz-Young, 2001;Zhu and Sarkis, 2004;Zsidisin, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic performance Reverse logistics costs [24,[35][36][37][38] Sustainability costs [8,11,23,26,37] Energy consumption costs 3. Social responsibility performance Green image [8,23,26,27,29,30] Customer perspective Percent recycling [8,11,17,23,26,27,30,32,36] Scrap rate treatment (landfill) and other stakeholders are involved in carrying out these green activities.…”
Section: Green Supply Chain Management Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these greening concepts, the environmentally conscious practices, and the motive for organizational competitiveness, GSCM can be defined as follows: Figure 2 shows the green practices in a closed loop green supply chain. Supply chain players such as used parts warehouses/storages, waste collectors, recycle plants, final Waste water or water pollution [7,8,11,21,22,[24][25][26] Solid waste or hazardous materials [21,22,[27][28][29][30][31][32] Energy usage or consumption [21,22,29,33,34] 2. Economic performance Reverse logistics costs [24,[35][36][37][38] Sustainability costs [8,11,23,26,37] Energy consumption costs 3.…”
Section: Green Supply Chain Management Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%