1957
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1957.59.2.02a00130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Limitation on Maya Culture: A Re‐Examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1957
1957
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, tropical environments were believed to be unsuitable for the development or maintenance of urbanism (Meggers 1954; but see Coe 1957). Several factors contributed to a general view that the Maya were less complex than their northern neighbors in central Mexico and were not truly urban (e.g., Sanders and Webster 1988; but see D. Chase et al 1990;Smith 1989): an incomplete understanding of the scale and variability of Maya sites (A. combined with the early investigation of sites with smaller populations in the southern lowlands (e.g., Piedras Negras [Weeks et al 2005] and Copan [Andrews and Fash 2005]), a lack of recognition of the variation in naturally available resources within the Maya Lowlands (Sanders 1973) and of their economic system (subsequently corrected by Dahlin et al 2007;Feinman and Garraty 2010;Garraty and Stark 2010), and to some degree expectations that urban forms should fit Western models (see discussion by Smith 2007).…”
Section: Maya Urbanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, tropical environments were believed to be unsuitable for the development or maintenance of urbanism (Meggers 1954; but see Coe 1957). Several factors contributed to a general view that the Maya were less complex than their northern neighbors in central Mexico and were not truly urban (e.g., Sanders and Webster 1988; but see D. Chase et al 1990;Smith 1989): an incomplete understanding of the scale and variability of Maya sites (A. combined with the early investigation of sites with smaller populations in the southern lowlands (e.g., Piedras Negras [Weeks et al 2005] and Copan [Andrews and Fash 2005]), a lack of recognition of the variation in naturally available resources within the Maya Lowlands (Sanders 1973) and of their economic system (subsequently corrected by Dahlin et al 2007;Feinman and Garraty 2010;Garraty and Stark 2010), and to some degree expectations that urban forms should fit Western models (see discussion by Smith 2007).…”
Section: Maya Urbanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith 1962, 268). William Coe (1957) astutely observed that Postclassic civilization could not have been less complex than the literate and regionally interdependent Contact period society that followed, with its sophisticated commercial system that impressed Spanish eyewitnesses (1957,331).…”
Section: "Other" (Late Pre-columbian) Mayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Sin embargo, tres años más tarde William Coe cuestionó este planteamiento al sugerir que la agricultura de roza y quema era mucho más productiva de lo que la mayor parte de los investigadores creían. 28 No obstante, aún en 1962, William T. Sanders sostuvo que la agricultura de roza -desmonte y quema-, utilizada por los mayas, produjo su colapso porque afectó drásticamente su ecosistema. 29 Y, aunque algunos autores como Dumond y Cowgill (1961) argumentaron que este sistema agrícola era altamente adaptativo y eficiente en determinadas áreas de la selva tropical, no cuestionaron que este fuese el principal sistema de producción agrícola de los mayas.…”
Section: Mapa 2 Petén Y Tierras Bajas Mayas Centralesunclassified