1999
DOI: 10.1139/z99-037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental influences on geographic variation in body size of western bobcats

Abstract: Hypotheses that explain geographic variation in body size were examined using cranial measurements of 950 bobcats (Lynx rufus) from western North America. Bobcats were divided into 25 geographic localities of similar habitats and landform (based on ecoregions). Principal component analyses were used to derive a single estimate of size from scores on the first principal component. Males and females were examined separately, because they were significantly dimorphic in body size and because sex and locality exhi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longitude (LON) was considered because several climatic variables show strong longitudinal gradients in the surveyed area (see Results). Altitude (ALT) in metres above sea level was determined for all localities and was included because frequently, an increase in elevation is ecologically equivalent to an increase in latitude (Wigginton & Dobson 1999). However, this kind of one-dimensional analyses have no explanatory power (Hawkins & Diniz Filho 2004), since size clines (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitude (LON) was considered because several climatic variables show strong longitudinal gradients in the surveyed area (see Results). Altitude (ALT) in metres above sea level was determined for all localities and was included because frequently, an increase in elevation is ecologically equivalent to an increase in latitude (Wigginton & Dobson 1999). However, this kind of one-dimensional analyses have no explanatory power (Hawkins & Diniz Filho 2004), since size clines (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, combined effects of temperature and humidity (James 1970), annual evapotranspiration as a measure of productivity (Rosenzweig 1968a,b), and seasonality (Boyce 1978(Boyce , 1979Lindstet and Boyce 1985) are hypothesized to better explain size variation in vertebrates. Few studies have compared all of these variables as predictors of size variation in single species, yet in each case seasonality better explained size variation than other variables (Boyce 1978;Murphy 1985;Wigginton and Dobson 1999;Ashton 2001b).…”
Section: Body Size Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive relations between body size and seasonality were found for muskrats [2], western bobcats [44], western rattlesnake [1], weevils [4] and sifakas [23]. In contrast, data on moose [10] and thirteen species of western Palaearctic carnivores [29] did not show clear correlations and thus did not support the hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%