2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental impacts of productivity-led working time reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A consensus exists that social protection must be organised independently of economic growth (Hirvilammi, 2020). Potential levers include structural and sectoral change (Hardt et al, 2021), curbing rent extraction (Stratford, 2020), containing labour productivity or labour volume (Cieplinski et al, 2021), and overcoming the ‘jobs and growth treadmill’ (Wiese and Mayrhofer, 2020). Principles of sustainable welfare: Principles of sustainable welfare can be based on human well-being, which includes social participation, opportunities for meaningful activity and psychological well-being, in addition to the material well-being of its citizens (Hirvilammi and Helne, 2014).…”
Section: Results: 20 Research Topics and Increasing Research Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consensus exists that social protection must be organised independently of economic growth (Hirvilammi, 2020). Potential levers include structural and sectoral change (Hardt et al, 2021), curbing rent extraction (Stratford, 2020), containing labour productivity or labour volume (Cieplinski et al, 2021), and overcoming the ‘jobs and growth treadmill’ (Wiese and Mayrhofer, 2020). Principles of sustainable welfare: Principles of sustainable welfare can be based on human well-being, which includes social participation, opportunities for meaningful activity and psychological well-being, in addition to the material well-being of its citizens (Hirvilammi and Helne, 2014).…”
Section: Results: 20 Research Topics and Increasing Research Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A future energy policy simulation conducted for Italy showed that a reduction in working time advanced environmental gains, at the cost of reduced incomes, suggesting the need for compensatory factors such as a basic income, again highlighting the link between income and carbon footprints (Cieplinski et al 2021a). This finding is supported by an additional investigation on productivity-led working time reduction and the commensurate reduction in carbon emissions that are not sustained at the same level when increased wages are allocated to lower working times (Cieplinski et al 2021b). Considering an alternative approach called the 'compressed work week', whereby employees increased their daily working time from 8 to 10 h, but worked one less day per week, a study in Utah found that this approach led to a 2% reduction in fuel consumption linked with a 14% reduction in carbon emissions (Percoco 2018).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Transformation scenarios require a work time reduction for those overworking and overproducing. One can distinguish several subordinate strategies: An external employment time reduction can be implemented by a general reduction of the workweek to 32 h or a 4-day-week, new public holidays, or a reduction of employment time in proportion to labor productivity increases-making sure productivity increases do neither lead to overproduction nor lay-offs (Cieplinski et al 2021). Temporal differentiation of social security can incentivize employers to offer a 25-h work week, by extending the predominating income-dependent contribution rate by a time-dependent contribution rate for employers that sets the lowest social security contributions rate at 25 h per week and increasing the rates to the margins.…”
Section: Work Time Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%