2019
DOI: 10.3390/challe10020005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Impact of the Average Hong Kong Diet: A Case for Adopting Sustainable Diets in Urban Centers

Abstract: As global population growth continues, the rapidly increasing demand for food and the environmental impact of this demand is a growing concern. Most food in Hong Kong is imported, which has implications for the associated environmental footprint. The carbon and water footprints (CF and WF) of the average Hong Kong diet were estimated from available sources and compared to well-accepted sustainable diets to characterize environmental sustainability. The total CF was 5701.90 g CO2-eq per capita/day, and the WF w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the starchy staples, especially rice, contributed the most to the blue water footprint. The findings on blue water footprint were similar to a study in Vietnam from Trinh et al but lower than a study from China (1.8 m 3 ) ( 26 , 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the starchy staples, especially rice, contributed the most to the blue water footprint. The findings on blue water footprint were similar to a study in Vietnam from Trinh et al but lower than a study from China (1.8 m 3 ) ( 26 , 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…per person) using a dataset from the same period, but lower than those reported for certain other regions with comparable diets, such as Hong Kong (5.7 kg CO 2 -eq. per person per day) ( 55 ). The GHGE from our Vietnamese study were also lower than those of high income countries, such as the Netherlands, Chile, and Japan ( 56 , 57 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another widely used methodology was the theoretical diets (n = 17), which in many cases were used in addition to assessing food consumption, scenarios, or standards to compare the environmental impacts. Some theoretical diets used were the Mediterranean diet, the EAT-Lancet reference diet, and different dietary patterns such as vegan and vegetarian (Sáez-Almendros et al, 2013;van de Kamp and Temme, 2018;Bruno et al, 2019;Esteve-Llorens et al, 2019aTang and Sobko, 2019;Batlle-Bayer et al, 2020;Grosso et al, 2020;Belgacem et al, 2021;Ridoutt et al, 2021;Vanham et al, 2021). This analysis is interesting because it allows comparability between different types of dietary patterns and allows us to understand which foods are impacting the most and where it is possible to improve.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another widely used methodology was the theoretical diets (n = 17), which in many cases were used in addition to assessing food consumption, scenarios, or standards to compare the environmental impacts. Some theoretical diets used were the Mediterranean diet, the EAT-Lancet reference diet, and different dietary patterns such as vegan and vegetarian (Sáez-Almendros et al, 2013;van de Kamp and Temme, 2018;Bruno et al, 2019;Esteve-Llorens et al, 2019aTang and Sobko, 2019;Batlle-Bayer et al, 2020;Grosso et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Belgacem et al, 2021;Ridoutt et al, 2021;Vanham et al, 2021). This analysis is interesting because it allows comparability between different types of dietary patterns and allows us to understand which foods are impacting the most and where it is possible to improve.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common discussion found among almost all selected studies was the emphasis given to the impacts of animal products, especially red meat (Sáez-Almendros et al, 2013;Song et al, 2015;Strasburg and Jahno, 2015;Leach et al, 2016;Sjörs et al, 2016;Biesbroek et al, 2017Biesbroek et al, , 2018de Laurentiis et al, 2017;Galli et al, 2017;Hadjikakou, 2017;Rosi et al, 2017;Veeramani et al, 2017;Lacour et al, 2018;Naja et al, 2018Naja et al, , 2020Seconda et al, 2018;van de Kamp and Temme, 2018;van Dooren et al, 2018b;Bahn et al, 2019;Bruno et al, 2019;Esteve-Llorens et al, 2019a, 2021aHatjiathanassiadou et al, 2019;Rose et al, 2019;Tang and Sobko, 2019;Batlle-Bayer et al, 2020;Cao et al, 2020;Chapa et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2020;González-García et al, 2020;Grasso et al, 2020;Han et al, 2020;Matzembacher et al, 2020;Mogensen et al, 2020;Rabès et al, 2020;Ridoutt et al, 2020;Scheelbeek et al, 2020;Travassos et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;<...…”
Section: The Role Of Animal-source Foods In Environmental Footprint V...mentioning
confidence: 99%