Geophysical Potential Fields 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811685-2.00011-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Geophysics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, based on aeromagnetic and gravity data, combined with the determination and analysis of stratigraphic density and magnetization rate parameters, different geophysical methods [31] are combined with seismic and drilling data as constraints, among which, the anomaly stripping method and Parker's iteration method are used for the depth of the Mesozoic bottom surface; the wavelet decomposition method is used for the regional gravity anomaly caused by the deep (mainly Moho surface) [32][33][34][35][36][37]; the calculated depth data are corrected with known drilling and seismic data as constraint control in the calculation process, and the thickness of the Upper Paleozoic and the depth of the Jurassic-Cretaceous bottom surface are obtained, respectively.…”
Section: Constructing Layering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, based on aeromagnetic and gravity data, combined with the determination and analysis of stratigraphic density and magnetization rate parameters, different geophysical methods [31] are combined with seismic and drilling data as constraints, among which, the anomaly stripping method and Parker's iteration method are used for the depth of the Mesozoic bottom surface; the wavelet decomposition method is used for the regional gravity anomaly caused by the deep (mainly Moho surface) [32][33][34][35][36][37]; the calculated depth data are corrected with known drilling and seismic data as constraint control in the calculation process, and the thickness of the Upper Paleozoic and the depth of the Jurassic-Cretaceous bottom surface are obtained, respectively.…”
Section: Constructing Layering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravitational data is measured by the appropriate filter method, and the residual maps are correctly interpreted. In that case, the results will provide helpful information for identifying the structural status of the oil traps (Adeyemo et al, 2022;Doulati Ardejani et al, 2011;Eppelbaum, 2019;Eshagh, 2021;Hosseini et al, 2013;Hosseini et al, 2014;Ojo et al, 2021;Sarma & Selvaraj, 1990). In potential field methods, there are three stages conception, processing, and interpretation, the most important of which is the interpretation of the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most discovery tasks, describing and modeling are done for the residual field. When employing the filter with different intensities to highlight the main structures of anomalies, it needed a clear and good map that can create a relative balance between the existing noise and signals (Cooper, 2004;Cooper & Cowan, 2006b, 2008Eppelbaum, 2019;Hidalgo-Gato & Barbosa, 2015;Pilkington & Keating, 2009;Telford et al, 1990). The frequency domain filter is first used for detecting the false and real anomalies and then used for detecting the spread and deep of the anomalies (Jacobsen, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%