2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02424-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental footprints of soybean production in China

Abstract: As a significant protein source for humans and animals, soybean ( Glycine max ) has experienced a fast growth with the rapid development of population and economy. Despite broad interest in energy consumption and CO 2 emissions generated by soybean production, there are few impact-oriented water footprint assessments of soybean production. This study evaluates the fossil energy, carbon, and water footprints of China’s soybean production so that key environmental im… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was concluded that greenhouse gas emissions from bioethanol production utilizing sugar beet were between 20 and 49 g CO 2 eq, and between 20 and 90 g CO 2 from wheat grain. According to a study conducted by Zhang, et al 45 , a study that evaluated fossil energy and carbon footprints of soybean production in China so that key environmental impact can be recognized. The global warming and the terrestrial ecotoxicity of the production process of 1 kg of soybean adhesive were 2.79 kg CO 2 and 6.36 kg 1,4-DCB 6.36, respectively, this explains that the terrestrial ecotoxicity of the wood composite production scenario (2.538 Kg1,4-DCB-eq), was higher than that of bioethanol (0.734 Kg1,4-DCB-eq) and biogas production scenarios (0.768 Kg1,4-DCB-eq).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded that greenhouse gas emissions from bioethanol production utilizing sugar beet were between 20 and 49 g CO 2 eq, and between 20 and 90 g CO 2 from wheat grain. According to a study conducted by Zhang, et al 45 , a study that evaluated fossil energy and carbon footprints of soybean production in China so that key environmental impact can be recognized. The global warming and the terrestrial ecotoxicity of the production process of 1 kg of soybean adhesive were 2.79 kg CO 2 and 6.36 kg 1,4-DCB 6.36, respectively, this explains that the terrestrial ecotoxicity of the wood composite production scenario (2.538 Kg1,4-DCB-eq), was higher than that of bioethanol (0.734 Kg1,4-DCB-eq) and biogas production scenarios (0.768 Kg1,4-DCB-eq).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SBM is routinely added to poultry feed as the main source of crude protein and amino acids [ 3 ]. However, soybean production and its supply chain are associated with negative environmental consequences, including deforestation, biodiversity loss, pesticide use, soil depletion, water usage, and greenhouse gas emissions [ 4 8 ]. In addition to these environmental costs, there is also a growing global health concern regarding in-feed antibiotic use in poultry diets for growth promotion and prophylactic purposes, as the inappropriate use of antibiotics has been linked to promoting the emergence and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) that threaten modern medicine [ 9 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%