2015
DOI: 10.3390/su8010024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Consciousness in Daily Activities Measured by Negative Prompts

Abstract: Abstract:The gap between people's attitude and action as regards environmental issues has been pointed out even while surveys registered an increase in people's environmental awareness. Among the possible reasons is that people tend to automatically answer "yes", as most surveys on environmental consciousness use positively-phrased questions or prompts. To remove the "yes-bias" in previous surveys, this present study conducted in Japan a large-scale questionnaire survey on environmental consciousness using neg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
3
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
21
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pembuatan instrumen survei kuantitatif dilakukan mengikuti kerangka desain survei pemasaran (Malhotra, 2010). Kuesioner yang digunakan menangkap informasi mengenai pengetahuan terhadap produk anyaman, faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan dalam membeli, sikap terhadap lingkungan, preferensi, dan kesediaan serta kemampuan membayar (Blare, Donovan, & del Pozo, 2017;Blend & Ravenswaay, 1998;Gan, Yen Wee, Ozanne, & Tzu-Hui, 2008;Haghjou, Hayati, Pishbahar, Mohammadrezaei, & Dashti, 2013;Hiramatsu, Kurisu, & Hanaki, 2016). Untuk mendapatkan informasi mengenai willingness to pay (WTP), responden dibiarkan mengisi jawaban secara terbuka.…”
Section: B Kerangka Teoritisunclassified
“…Pembuatan instrumen survei kuantitatif dilakukan mengikuti kerangka desain survei pemasaran (Malhotra, 2010). Kuesioner yang digunakan menangkap informasi mengenai pengetahuan terhadap produk anyaman, faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan dalam membeli, sikap terhadap lingkungan, preferensi, dan kesediaan serta kemampuan membayar (Blare, Donovan, & del Pozo, 2017;Blend & Ravenswaay, 1998;Gan, Yen Wee, Ozanne, & Tzu-Hui, 2008;Haghjou, Hayati, Pishbahar, Mohammadrezaei, & Dashti, 2013;Hiramatsu, Kurisu, & Hanaki, 2016). Untuk mendapatkan informasi mengenai willingness to pay (WTP), responden dibiarkan mengisi jawaban secara terbuka.…”
Section: B Kerangka Teoritisunclassified
“…Surveys typically frame the environment in a positive manner as does most literature and that causes people to respond positively about their support for PEBs. But, when researchers reversed the framing and put PEB in a negative light, support for PEBs was much lower (Hiramatsu, Kurisu, & Hanaki, 2015). This could imply that part of the gap in awareness and behavior is based on the fact that a percentage of those who present as if they care about environmental issues, may only be doing so because they believe that there is a descriptive norm that everyone should be willing to work to improve the environment.…”
Section: Group Normative Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because this study was limited to self-reported behaviors due to the practical complexities of gathering energy usage data (see methods section), it is possible that the results do not reflect actual energy conservation [44]. It would have been ideal to collect direct data on energy usage and compare that to self-reports.…”
Section: Behavioral Persistencementioning
confidence: 99%