2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental characteristics associated with the presence of the Spinetail devil ray (Mobula mobular) in the eastern tropical Pacific

Abstract: In the eastern Pacific Ocean, the tropical tuna purse-seine fishery incidentally captures high numbers of five mobulid bycatch species; all of which are classified as mortalities by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission due to uncertainties in post-release mortality rates. To date, the factors (operational or environmental) leading to the capture of these species by the fishery have not been well studied. Here, we developed Generalized Additive Models for fisheries observer data to analyze the relationsh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Equatorial area was also predicted to be an important area of presence for the species. In that sense, the INLA-SPDE model confirms the results obtained by Lezama-Ochoa, et al 41 with the correct identification of the most important areas for the species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The Equatorial area was also predicted to be an important area of presence for the species. In that sense, the INLA-SPDE model confirms the results obtained by Lezama-Ochoa, et al 41 with the correct identification of the most important areas for the species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regarding evaluation of the model predictions, there are not many differences between frequentist and Bayesian approaches. For example, Lezama-Ochoa, et al 41 obtained similar accuracy indices with slightly better AUC values found in the frequentist GAM model (0.92) than in our INLA model (0.88).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations