2002
DOI: 10.1126/science.1071987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Change and Antarctic Seabird Populations

Abstract: Recent changes in Antarctic seabird populations may reflect direct and indirect responses to regional climate change. The best long-term data for high-latitude Antarctic seabirds (Adélie and Emperor penguins and snow petrels) indicate that winter sea-ice has a profound influence. However, some effects are inconsistent between species and areas, some in opposite directions at different stages of breeding and life cycles, and others remain paradoxical. The combination of recent harvest driven changes and those c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
320
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 376 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
320
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…5b) may have contributed to this stabilization of juvenile survival. Complex environmental effects on Adélie penguin survival Large-scale atmospheric indices and associated regional changes in marine conditions have been implicated in trends in numerous seabird populations around the world (Veit et al 1996;Croxall et al 2002;Sandvik et al 2005;Devney et al 2009). In Antarctica, the responses of penguin populations to environmental variability have included changes in abundance (e.g., Trathan et al 1996;Wilson et al 2001), but also included shifts in range (Emslie et al 1998), changes in breeding phenology Hinke et al 2012), and changes in foraging behavior (Fraser and Hofmann 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5b) may have contributed to this stabilization of juvenile survival. Complex environmental effects on Adélie penguin survival Large-scale atmospheric indices and associated regional changes in marine conditions have been implicated in trends in numerous seabird populations around the world (Veit et al 1996;Croxall et al 2002;Sandvik et al 2005;Devney et al 2009). In Antarctica, the responses of penguin populations to environmental variability have included changes in abundance (e.g., Trathan et al 1996;Wilson et al 2001), but also included shifts in range (Emslie et al 1998), changes in breeding phenology Hinke et al 2012), and changes in foraging behavior (Fraser and Hofmann 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many seabirds display such life history traits, but observed variation and directional change in environmental conditions have caused changes in phenology, breeding and foraging ranges, and population trends of numerous seabirds (Veit et al 1996;Sandvik et al 2005;Barbraud and Weimerskirch 2006;Devney et al 2009). In particular, long-term data on Antarctic seabirds dependent on sea ice habitats, including emperor (Aptenodytes forsteri) and Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae), and snow petrels (Pagodroma nivea) suggest that variation in the seasonal duration and spatial extent of winter sea ice can be important drivers of population change (Croxall et al 2002;Jenouvrier et al 2005;Emmerson and Southwell 2011). Demographic models that link vital rates to environmental drivers (e.g., Jenouvrier et al 2009) and habitatassociation models (e.g., Ainley et al 2010) suggest that continued warming and loss of sea ice in Antarctica may hasten declines in the abundance of ice-obligate species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging evidence suggests that warming has decreased the number of cold years with heavy winter sea ice and that as a consequence penguin populations are showing substantial concurrent population responses (Fraser et al, 1992;Fraser & Trivelpiece, 1996;Croxall et al, 2002;Smith et al, 2003). Current hypotheses suggest that in general, in locations where species' breeding ranges overlap, sea ice reduction has produced habitat conditions more suitable for ice-intolerant species, which have increased in numbers, whereas ice-dependent species have declined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Arctic, only a few species of seabirds are dependent on sea ice as a platform on which to forage or rest (e.g., Divoky et al, 2015); in contrast, in the Antarctic many species of seabirds use sea ice during their life cycles. However, the response of ice-associated seabirds is likely to differ regionally based on projected increases or decreases in sea-ice cover (Croxall et al, 2002;D.G. Ainley et al, 2010;D.A.…”
Section: Effects Of Advective Changes On Seabirds and Marine Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 99%