2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00074-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental autocorrelation: curse or blessing?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When taken in conjunction with the theoretical work of Roy et al (2005), our experimental results have broad implications for our understanding of species persistence in heterogeneous and deteriorating landscapes (Schiegg 2003). For example, these findings suggest that weak sink populations found at the edge of a species' range should show highly variable ''outbreak'' dynamics (Mehlman 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…When taken in conjunction with the theoretical work of Roy et al (2005), our experimental results have broad implications for our understanding of species persistence in heterogeneous and deteriorating landscapes (Schiegg 2003). For example, these findings suggest that weak sink populations found at the edge of a species' range should show highly variable ''outbreak'' dynamics (Mehlman 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…2003). Tem‐poral autocorrelation has typically been viewed as an anathema to population persistence in patchy, variable environments (Schiegg 2003); however, as I show below temporal correlation coupled with the appropriate behavioural responses of organisms enhances population persistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…the spatial autocorrelation issue (Dale et al 1991;Jongman et al 1997;Schiegg 2003). In order for two relevés not to be overly influenced by each other's seeds and clonal plants, 100 m was taken as the minimum distance between two relevés during the field research, with that distance being much greater in the majority of cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%