Entrustment of the on-call senior medical resident role: implications for patient safety and collective care

Abstract

BackgroundThe on-call responsibilities of a senior medicine resident (SMR) may include the admission transition of patient care on medical teaching teams (MTT), supervision of junior trainees, and ensuring patient safety. In many institutions, there is no standardised assessment of SMR competency prior to granting these on-call responsibilities in internal medicine. In order to fulfill competency based medical education requirements, training programs need to develop assessment approaches to make and defend such entrustment decisions.The purpose of this study is to understand the clinical activities and outcomes of the on-call SMR role and provide training programs with a rigorous model for entrustment decisions for this role.MethodsThis four phase study utilizes a constructivist grounded theory approach to collect and analyse the following data sets: case study, focus groups, literature synthesis of supervisory practices and return-of-findings focus groups.The study was conducted in two Academic Health Sciences Centres in Ontario, Canada. The case study included ten attending physicians, 13 SMRs, 19 first year residents and 14 medical students. The focus groups included 19 SMRs. The later, return-of-findings focus groups included ten SMRs.ResultsFive core on-call supervisory tasks (overseeing ongoing patient care, briefing, case review, documentation and preparing for handover) were identified, as well as a range of practices associated with these tasks. We also identified challenges that influenced the extent to which SMRs were able to effectively perform the core tasks. At times, these challenges led to omissions of the core tasks and potentially compromised patient safety and the admission transition of care.ConclusionBy identifying the core supervisory tasks and associated practices, we were able to identify the competencies for the on-call SMR role. Our findings can further be used by training programs for assessment and for making entrustment decisions.

Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review

“…Most adopted the Delphi approach or a modified version of it, and some sought expert discussions . A few studies shortlisted important EPAs through online surveys or focus groups . EPAs were mostly mapped to their respective competencies or curricula's milestones.…”

“…Programmes that considered applying EPAs usually had existing milestones or training frameworks that could be enhanced by EPAs . The first step to incorporating EPAs into existing curricula is to establish a process to identify, elaborate and validate these EPAs .…”

Formal Versus Informal Judgments: Faculty Experiences With Entrustment in Graduate Medical Education

“…This can create uncertainty for residents about what they are allowed to do on their own, which may have implications for patient safety. 15 It is essential to understand the relationship between formal, explicit entrustment and informal entrustment in clinical practice. To address this gap, what is the relationship between formal and informal entrustment from a faculty member's perspective?…”

Improving paediatric residents’ knowledge and perspectives regarding the insulin pump using a novel educational workshop

“…Residents are the point of contact for the covering attendings,7 and by default, also for the diabetes specialists, when latter are not available to oversee patient care immediately, which is an important and critical part of their training 8. They may frequently encounter patients with IPs in their continuity clinic, the inpatient floors, the emergency department and intensive care units.…”