Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth*

Hoselitz, Bert F.

doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.1952.tb00480.x

Cited by 53 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1959) argued that entrepreneurs informed the market of new elements. Hoselitz (1952Hoselitz ( , 1968) observed a higher level of tolerance that enabled entrepreneurs to work in conditions of ambiguity and uncertainty. Casson (1982) developed a theory linking entrepreneurs with economic development.…”

Section: Understanding Entrepreneurshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector: The Dance of the Chameleon

Sadler

2000

Aust J Public Adm

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores the application of corporate entrepreneurship within the public sector. It outlines research that investigates whether those factors, which the literature describes as stimulating corporate entrepreneurship in the private sector, apply to the public sector. It concludes that entrepreneurship is a strategic phenomenon and, as a consequence, the unique environmental influences on public sector bodies generate stimulants and constraints to corporate entrepreneurship,which vary from those applicable to the private sector.

show abstract

Section: Understanding Entrepreneurshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector: The Dance of the Chameleon

Sadler

2000

Aust J Public Adm

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…What then can we learn about entrepreneurship and small business owner-management in these emerging economy contexts that we do not already know? Entrepreneurship has been classically linked to economic development in emerging economies (Hoselitz, 1952;De Forest, 1965;Heller, 1968;Leibenstein, 1968;Awad, 1971;Bertrand, 1972;Koo, 1976;Diaku, 1977;Leff, 1978;Ferdows, 1980;Hu, 1981;Dawson, 1982;Encarnation, 1982;Delorme et al, 1986;El-Namaki, 1988;Huff, 1989;Brockhaus, 1991;Giamartino, 1991;Harper, 1991). Nonetheless, there remain a number of significant research gaps and opportunities to make novel contributions.…”

Section: Theorizing Entrepreneurship and Small Business Ownership: Dementioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction to the Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies

Scott¹,

Sinha²,

Gibb³

et al. 2020

Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The entrepreneurs who bring the entrepreneurial activities up to the high extent of establishing the company and then making it profitable through innovativeness and creativeness are referred as "Schumpeterian entrepreneurs" (Cuadrado-Roura & Garcia-Tabuenca, 2008). Other researchers who have seen innovation in the context of entrepreneurship such as Hoselitz (1960) who claims innovation is a part of entrepreneurship, Dollinger (1995) considered it as a development of innovative economic institute, Rwigema and Venter (2004) recognised it as "the process of conceptualising, organising, launching, and nurturing a business opportunity into a potentially high growth venture in a complex, and unstable environment".…”

Section: Concept Of Innovation In Entrepreneurshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Conceptual Study on Contingent Impact of External Integration on Innovation Sme Business Success Relationship

Khairuddin¹,

Qureshi²,

Wahid³

et al. 2019

IJFR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is widely acknowledged in the existing studies that innovation has the critical role in firms’ performances. Moreover, it has been acknowledged that innovative activities are the main sources of growth, survivability, and success for SMEs firms. In the setting of entrepreneurship, earlier studies have claimed that innovation is the integrated element of entrepreneurship. However, the existing studies have also revealed inconsistent findings regarding the impacts of innovation on firm’s performances under various contexts. Thus, this study claims that there should be a moderator to facilitate the relationship between innovations and firm’s performances. Therefore, this study has introduced the external integration as a moderator to improve the relationship between types of innovations and firm’s performances. The main objective of the study is to identify the relationship between various types of innovations including process innovation, product innovation, marketing innovation, and organizational innovations and business success operationalized with four dimensions including perceived financial performance, perceived non-financial performance, perceived business growth, and perceived performance relative to competitors) under the moderating role of external integration. Three theories namely Strategic Contingency Theory (SCT), Resource Dependence Theory (RDT), and Resource Based View (RBV) have been integrated to develop the proposed theoretical framework. The recent literature has been taken to gather the information about the variables that helped current study to develop a theoretical frame work and then eight propositions have been developed based on proposed theoretical framework. The external integration as a moderator between innovations and business success is the main theoretical contribution of this study. Furthermore, limitations have been stated at the end and recommendations have been made for future research.

show abstract

Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth*

Cited by 53 publications

References 0 publications

Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector: The Dance of the Chameleon

Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector: The Dance of the Chameleon

Introduction to the Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies

A Conceptual Study on Contingent Impact of External Integration on Innovation Sme Business Success Relationship

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About