2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10340-020-01306-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entomopathogenic fungal endophyte-mediated tritrophic interactions between Spodoptera littoralis and its parasitoid Hyposoter didymator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also showed that parasitoids were more attracted to inoculated plants over control plants when they were infested by aphids, although no significant differences in attraction were observed in the absence of aphids (percentage of attraction to noninoculated and inoculated plants 50.5% and 49.5%, respectively). Previous studies have demonstrated that natural enemies can show an increased attraction to endophytically colonized plants infested with host insects, although results can vary depending on the involved species and environmental conditions 35,64–66 . In most studies, the natural enemies were allowed to physically contact the hosts, not distinguishing between plant VOC cues and host quality or host product (contact) cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results also showed that parasitoids were more attracted to inoculated plants over control plants when they were infested by aphids, although no significant differences in attraction were observed in the absence of aphids (percentage of attraction to noninoculated and inoculated plants 50.5% and 49.5%, respectively). Previous studies have demonstrated that natural enemies can show an increased attraction to endophytically colonized plants infested with host insects, although results can vary depending on the involved species and environmental conditions 35,64–66 . In most studies, the natural enemies were allowed to physically contact the hosts, not distinguishing between plant VOC cues and host quality or host product (contact) cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that natural enemies can show an increased attraction to endophytically colonized plants infested with host insects, although results can vary depending on the involved species and environmental conditions. 35,[64][65][66] In most studies, the natural enemies were allowed to physically contact the hosts, not distinguishing between plant VOC cues and host quality or host product (contact) cues. In our experiments, parasitoids could not contact the aphids, showing that changes in VOC composition on fungal colonization influenced the attractiveness of the plant for natural enemies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worthwhile mentioning that we worked under axenic conditions and that the colonization of young plants by EF was assessed 14 days after treatment. The endophytic property of these EF strains was previously reported in other plant species and systems, such as sorghum [23,41], melon [43], and wheat [37,38]. In the case of sunflower, plant colonization by these strains has already been reported through both microbiological [23] and molecular [19] approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In the case of sunflower, plant colonization by these strains has already been reported through both microbiological [23] and molecular [19] approaches. Most studies focus on transient colonization of plants by EF after foliar spraying [43,44], but there is strong evidence of long-term endophytic colonization following soil treatment [19,23]. However, colonization patterns tend to be erratic and inconsistent, especially when assessed through the re-isolation of the EF from plant tissue [14,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several studies have shown the efficacy of species from the genera Metarhizium and Beauveria to control herbivores in crops like olive, corn, wheat, tomato, sunflower, melon and soybean amongst others [ 11 , 49 , 65 , 67 ]. Besides, they play other roles beyond pest control with direct and indirect benefits for plant growth through nutrient mobilization and/or mediation of trophic relationships [ 8 , 9 , 68 , 69 , 70 ]. Increasing the bioavailability of nutrients through phytohormones production and improvement of water transport are ways that IPF promote plant growth directly; they also benefit plants through indirect mechanisms involving induction of systemic resistance to harmful organisms [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%