Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Confer 2021
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-short.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entity Enhancement for Implicit Discourse Relation Classification in the Biomedical Domain

Abstract: Implicit discourse relation classification is a challenging task, in particular when the text domain is different from the standard Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB;Prasad et al., 2008) training corpus domain (Wall Street Journal in 1990s). We here tackle the task of implicit discourse relation classification on the biomedical domain, for which the Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank (BioDRB; Prasad et al., 2011) is available. We show that entity information can be used to improve discourse relational argument re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies (Xu et al, 2018;Dai and Huang, 2019;Kishimoto et al, 2020;Shi and Demberg, 2021) alleviate this problem by data augmentation or additional knowledge. However, there are several deficiencies: 1) the difficulty of annotating sufficient data and introducing appropriate knowledge is considerable; 2) noisy data drive models to deviate from the target feature dis-tribution, and unreasonable knowledge injection exacerbates the collapse of feature space of PLMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies (Xu et al, 2018;Dai and Huang, 2019;Kishimoto et al, 2020;Shi and Demberg, 2021) alleviate this problem by data augmentation or additional knowledge. However, there are several deficiencies: 1) the difficulty of annotating sufficient data and introducing appropriate knowledge is considerable; 2) noisy data drive models to deviate from the target feature dis-tribution, and unreasonable knowledge injection exacerbates the collapse of feature space of PLMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%