1970
DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.24-2612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enthalpies of Vaporization of Organic Compounds. VII. Some Carboxylic Acids.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the experimental vaporization and sublimation enthalpies for these materials reported in this and previous publications [1] are not state properties and should not be used in adjusting heats of formation data or in any other thermochemical cycle without appropriate adjustments for the equilibrium observed in the gas phase as reported previously for the mono-carboxylic acids [13]. The vaporization enthalpies of the smaller homologues are for the most part consistent with previous literature results on sublimation enthalpies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore the experimental vaporization and sublimation enthalpies for these materials reported in this and previous publications [1] are not state properties and should not be used in adjusting heats of formation data or in any other thermochemical cycle without appropriate adjustments for the equilibrium observed in the gas phase as reported previously for the mono-carboxylic acids [13]. The vaporization enthalpies of the smaller homologues are for the most part consistent with previous literature results on sublimation enthalpies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Use of ΔS vap = 0.025 cal/(mol K) yields a liquid heat of formation that is 2 kcal/mol too positive as compared to experiment. 61,72 The calculated gas-phase heat of formation of succinic acid is in good agreement with the experiment to within 1 kcal/mol. 47,59 For the trans-n-pentenoic acids, estimated values of ΔS vap are 0.034, 0.031, and 0.032 cal/(mol K) for n = 2, 3, and 4, respectively.…”
Section: ' Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…results (Verevkin et al, 2000) at 298.15 K for the ethanoic [∆ l g H°m ) (42.43 ( 0.83) kJ‚mol -1 ] and propanoic [∆ l g H°m ) (51.40 ( 0.38) kJ‚mol -1 ] acids from transpiration shows the clear disagreement with those from Konicek and Wadsö (1970); see Table 2 (column 11). Following, the vapor phase contains associated molecules of acid in the transpiration experiments on both compounds.…”
Section: Comparison Of the ∆ L G H°m Values Obtained By Transpirationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is not possible to assess the degree of dimerization of the vapor phase in the transpiration experiments quantitatively. But, the enthalpies of vaporization obtained from calorimetry (Konicek and Wadsö, 1970) and corrected to the process RCOOH(liquid, 298.15 K) S RCOOH(gas, monomer, 298.15 K) using data for dimerization enthalpies could be used as a criterion of the correctness of the enthalpies of vaporization measured by the transpiration method for lower carboxylic acids. Comparison of our a Derived from the transpiration in this work (see Table 1).…”
Section: Comparison Of the ∆ L G H°m Values Obtained By Transpirationmentioning
confidence: 99%