1979
DOI: 10.1039/f19797500603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enthalpies of formation of homoleptic dimethylamido compounds of tantlum (V), molybdenum (III), molybdenum (IV), tungsten (III) and tungsten (VI). Enthalpy contributions of metal–metal triple bonds

Abstract: Solution, combustion and other calorimetric studies on dimethylamido-metal compounds of Ta, Mo, and W have led to the following enthalpies of formation at 25°C (kJ mol-') : * (IBP) isothermal bomb process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these results, we have calculated an average PDMAT vaporization enthalpy value of 97.5 ± 27 kJ mol −1 at 31 °C. This result is in the range of the literature values for the total pressure 26–28. Using the second law of thermodynamics, PDMAT average partial enthalpies of sublimation for the two species Ta[N(CH 3 ) 2 ] 4 and Ta[N(CH 3 ) 2 ] 5 are 63 ± 8 kJ mol −1 and 45 ± 10 kJ mol −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Pdmat Thermodynamic Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…From these results, we have calculated an average PDMAT vaporization enthalpy value of 97.5 ± 27 kJ mol −1 at 31 °C. This result is in the range of the literature values for the total pressure 26–28. Using the second law of thermodynamics, PDMAT average partial enthalpies of sublimation for the two species Ta[N(CH 3 ) 2 ] 4 and Ta[N(CH 3 ) 2 ] 5 are 63 ± 8 kJ mol −1 and 45 ± 10 kJ mol −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Pdmat Thermodynamic Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The essential diffi culties are clearly evident, in a representative way, for the M 2 (NMe 2 ) 6 molecules. 96 102 The latter is so weak that this may well be tantamount to an estimate of the Cr-Cr bond energy. The dissociation energy of the Rh−Rh bond 103 in Rh 2 (OEP) 2 has been shown to be 69 ± 3 kJ mol -1 .…”
Section: Bond Energiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the formation of 2 and 3 from thermolysis of 1 , a Ta–NMe 2 bond and a N–SiMe 3 bond are cleaved, and the π bond in TaNSiMe 3 and the Si–N bond in 2 are formed (Scheme ). Bond energies in 1 and 4 are unknown . Breaking of the Si–N bond in 1 is probably compensated for by the Si–N bond formed in 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%