2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00546-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterprise resource planning: Developments and directions for operations management research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
85
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this area, the application of the concepts of systems thinking has contributed to the development of approaches such as Total Quality Management (TQM) (Bennett and Kerr 1996;Helzer 1994;Jackson 1995;Mulej and Rebernik 1994;Plenert 1995;Taiwo 2001), Business Process Management (BPR) (Ackermann et al 1999;Fowler 1998;Ursic et al 2005), Balanced Score Card (Kaplan and Norton 2007;Kunc 2008) and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) (Jacobs and Bendoly 2003). Many of these approaches draw on ideas not only from systems thinking but also from, economics, strategic management (Ackermann, Walls et al 1999;Evans et al 1995) and Information Systems (Ackermann, Walls et al 1999;Ormerod 1999b).…”
Section: Production Tqm Project Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this area, the application of the concepts of systems thinking has contributed to the development of approaches such as Total Quality Management (TQM) (Bennett and Kerr 1996;Helzer 1994;Jackson 1995;Mulej and Rebernik 1994;Plenert 1995;Taiwo 2001), Business Process Management (BPR) (Ackermann et al 1999;Fowler 1998;Ursic et al 2005), Balanced Score Card (Kaplan and Norton 2007;Kunc 2008) and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) (Jacobs and Bendoly 2003). Many of these approaches draw on ideas not only from systems thinking but also from, economics, strategic management (Ackermann, Walls et al 1999;Evans et al 1995) and Information Systems (Ackermann, Walls et al 1999;Ormerod 1999b).…”
Section: Production Tqm Project Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are often touted as a means for (1) standardizing and centralizing specific processes, hence reducing variation in processing practice, time, and error; (2) increasing the transparency of process work and outcomes across an organization and; (3) increasing the predictability of processes for operational and strategic planning purposes as a result of these first two capabilities (Bendoly and Jacobs, 2005;Jacobs and Bendoly, 2003;Rabinovich et aI., 2003;McAfee, 2002). Regardless of the form and function of the ERP, it is clear that the imposition of the system's codified protocols on work processes is likely to have some impact on the form and function of the organization, and on the behavior of those in the organization charged with its use (Cotteleer and Bendoly, in press).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standardized, automated, and integrated ERP system environment is also expected to efficiently process transactions and reduce reporting lags (e.g., O'Leary 2000; Hitt et al 2002;Jacobs and Bendoly 2003). Anecdotal evidence supports this expectation, indicating that ERP system adoptions positively affect the timeliness of financial accounting information by decreasing the financial close cycle (e.g., Brown 1997;Jensen and Johnson 1999;Wah 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%