Enteral feeding: techniques of administration.

Jones, Barry

doi:10.1136/gut.27.suppl_1.47

Cited by 23 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Both the rate and method of administration of Osmolite® in this study were consistent with the use of enteral feeding solutions in patients (Bastow 1986;Jones 1986). Osmolite® contains a concentration of magnesium similar to that of other enteral feeding solutions used clinically, i.e.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 51%

The Relative Bioavailability of Temafloxacin Administered through a Nasogastric Tube With and Without Enteral Feeding

Lubowski

Nightingale

Sweeney

et al. 1992

Clinical Pharmacokinetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relative bioavailability of a single oral dose oftemafloxacin given with and without enteral feeding was determined in 18 healthy male volunteers in a randomised crossover study. Subjects were administered 600mg oftemafloxacin orally as an intact tablet, or a crushed tablet suspended in water administered through a nasogastric tube with or without an enteral feeding solution [Osmolite® (Ross) 100 ml/h started 2h before administration oftemafloxacin and continued for 4h postdosej. Plasma samples were analysed by a high performance liquia chromatographic technique. Mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) for the oral tablet, crushed tablet, and crushed tablet with enteral feeding solution were 3.95 ± 1.02,4.85 ± 0.69, and 4.69 ± 0.61 mgfLj70kg, respectively, and mean calculated area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 48h (AUC(0-48h» values were 48.1 ± 11.0, 54.5 ± 6.52, and 49.7 ± 5.89 mgfL' hj70kg, respectively. In terms of AUC(0-48h) and Cmax, the relative bioavailability of temafloxacin after nasogastric delivery of crushed temafloxacin given with and without an enteral feeding solution was equivalent to the reference oral regimen.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 51%

The Relative Bioavailability of Temafloxacin Administered through a Nasogastric Tube With and Without Enteral Feeding

Lubowski

Nightingale

Sweeney

et al. 1992

Clinical Pharmacokinetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The denominator is the number of patients who had a feeding tube inserted. 53,54 If tube feeding were restricted to patients who could not tolerate an oral diet, this would result in substantial avoidance of discomfort and costs. ‡ The need for a nasogastric tube to be inserted for decompression or the need for parenteral nutrition was indicated by the attending physician.…”

Section: Figure 1 Calories Delivered With the Use Of Early Versus Onmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early versus On-Demand Nasoenteric Tube Feeding in Acute Pancreatitis

Brunschot¹,

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Only two patients had en- (mean 85.2 k 12.9) (mean 86.4 k 12.2) (range 66-100) (range 66-100) Keohane et al (1984) showed that up to one third of their sample population did not receive the total volume of feed prescribed. Further publications by Jones (1986), Silk (1986), Rees et al (1988 and Abernathy et 01. (1989) show similar findings.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

How much of the prescribed volume of enteral feed does the hospitalized patient actually receive?

Robertson

1990

J Human Nutrition Diet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This pilot study was carried out to establish how many interruptions occurred to patients receiving continuous enteral feeding regimens and the associated percentage of feed losses. It measured how much of a prescribed volume of feed patients actually received during a period of enteral nutritional support. The data for 15 patients (medical and surgical) who were maintained on a standard feeding regimen for a minimum period of five days (range 5–10 days) were analysed. All feeds were administered using Abbott Flexiflo enteral feeding pumps. The patients' weight and serum albumin values were recorded prior to, and at the end of, the study. Although all patients received significantly less feed than had been prescribed there were no significant changes in either of these variables.

show abstract

Enteral feeding: techniques of administration.

Cited by 23 publications

References 19 publications

The Relative Bioavailability of Temafloxacin Administered through a Nasogastric Tube With and Without Enteral Feeding

The Relative Bioavailability of Temafloxacin Administered through a Nasogastric Tube With and Without Enteral Feeding

Early versus On-Demand Nasoenteric Tube Feeding in Acute Pancreatitis

How much of the prescribed volume of enteral feed does the hospitalized patient actually receive?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About