2020
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2020.2985285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entanglement teleportation with photons from quantum dots: towards a solid-state based quantum network

Abstract: Semiconductor quantum dots are currently emerging as one of the most promising sources of non-classical light on which to base future quantum networks. They can generate single photons as well as pairs of entangled photons with unprecedented brightness, indistinguishability, and degree of entanglement. These features have very recently opened up the possibility to perform advanced quantum optics protocols that were previously inaccessible to single quantum emitters. In this work, we report on two experiments t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(154 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2B reports an autocorrelation measurement run on the exciton emission line with a dedicated Hanbury-Brown and Twiss setup in laboratory conditions, corresponding to , a value mainly limited by the detector time resolution. Even if this figure were to be entirely attributed to multiphoton emission, it would still be a minor cause of below-unity entanglement fidelity, with an expected contribution of 0.3% in a simple model of the density matrix ( 30 ). With a similar experimental procedure, we measure the cross-correlation function between the two photons of the entangled pair to determine the fidelity of preparation, defined as the probability of a laser pulse to promote the QD from the optically active ground state to the biexciton state, followed by the two-photon emission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2B reports an autocorrelation measurement run on the exciton emission line with a dedicated Hanbury-Brown and Twiss setup in laboratory conditions, corresponding to , a value mainly limited by the detector time resolution. Even if this figure were to be entirely attributed to multiphoton emission, it would still be a minor cause of below-unity entanglement fidelity, with an expected contribution of 0.3% in a simple model of the density matrix ( 30 ). With a similar experimental procedure, we measure the cross-correlation function between the two photons of the entangled pair to determine the fidelity of preparation, defined as the probability of a laser pulse to promote the QD from the optically active ground state to the biexciton state, followed by the two-photon emission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12,33,[57][58][59] For example, coherency, entanglement, and tunneling can be further explored in quantum interferencebased devices, [60,61] single-photon emitters and detectors, [62,63] and quantum networks. [64][65][66][67] The quantum effect is explained further (in terms of the sub-nanometer size gap between two resonators) in the last section of this review. As discussed at length in the literature, plasmon coupling can occur over a 5 nm gap distance between plasmon dimers; thus, it is categorized as belonging to the classical regime.…”
Section: Classical and Quantum Nanoplasmonics: From Bulk Nano And Cluster Scales Down To Atomic Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the polarization density matrix is derived from the Stokes parameters 41 . The total rate of threefold coincidences is 0.8 Hz, which is expected from the efficiency figures of merit of the setup and the source 30 . In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Figure 1a shows the emission spectrum of the QD studied in this paper, which contains the signature of the two optical transitions of the biexciton-exciton (XX-X) radiative cascade. Using a resonant two-photon excitation scheme, the photon pairs are produced with a preparation fidelity of 0.88, as estimated by intensity cross-correlation measurements 30 . To show how the protocol works with suboptimal QDs, we chose one with a linewidth far larger than the average value of the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation