2003
DOI: 10.1088/1464-4266/5/6/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entanglement purification of multi-mode quantum states

Abstract: An iterative random procedure is considered allowing an entanglement purification of a class of multi-mode quantum states. In certain cases, a complete purification may be achieved using only a single signal state preparation. A physical implementation based on beam splitter arrays and non-linear elements is suggested. The influence of loss is analyzed in the example of a purification of entangled N-mode coherent states.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two notable problems with most of the proposed uses of cross-Kerr nonlinearities of Refs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: A Further Motivation and Structure Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are two notable problems with most of the proposed uses of cross-Kerr nonlinearities of Refs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: A Further Motivation and Structure Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further motivation and structure of the paper There are two notable problems with most of the proposed uses of cross-Kerr nonlinearities of Refs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. arXiv:1604.03914v3 [quant-ph] 19 Aug 2016…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pan et al [16] found a linear optical device, a polarizing beam splitter, to take the role of the C-NOT gate. Subsequently, some other theoretical and experimental schemes for the entanglement purification have been presented [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%