2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ffa.2018.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entanglement-assisted quantum MDS codes from constacyclic codes with large minimum distance

Abstract: The entanglement-assisted (EA) formalism allows arbitrary classical linear codes to transform into entanglement-assisted quantum error correcting codes (EAQECCs) by using pre-shared entanglement between the sender and the receiver. In this work, we propose a decomposition of the defining set of constacyclic codes. Using this method, we construct four classes of q-ary entanglement-assisted quantum MDS (EAQMDS) codes based on classical constacyclic MDS codes by exploiting less pre-shared maximally entangled stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a defining set T of a non-dual-containing (or non-self-orthogonal) classical codes is T ∩T −q = ∅. In order to construct EA-quantum MDS codes for larger distance than q + 1 of code length n ≤ q 2 + 1, we recall the fundamental definition of decomposition of the defining set of constacyclic codes [35]. There are also other types of definition for decomposition of the defining set of cyclic codes, negacyclic codes, see [14,26,33,34].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, a defining set T of a non-dual-containing (or non-self-orthogonal) classical codes is T ∩T −q = ∅. In order to construct EA-quantum MDS codes for larger distance than q + 1 of code length n ≤ q 2 + 1, we recall the fundamental definition of decomposition of the defining set of constacyclic codes [35]. There are also other types of definition for decomposition of the defining set of cyclic codes, negacyclic codes, see [14,26,33,34].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 2.4 [35]. Let T be a defining set of a constacyclic code C, T = T ss ∪ T sas be decomposition of T .…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…α , which is different from the one used in [11], [28]. Additionally, by the method, the length of entanglement-assisted quantum codes is more general, so we can obtain more entanglement-assisted quantum MDS codes with minimum distance that is more than q 2 + 1 relative to the ones of [19], [26], [27]. Furthermore, we can also use the same method of the decomposition of the defining set of constacyclic codes to obtain other entanglement-assisted quantum MDS codes with the number of pre-shared maximally entangled states that exceeds 9 in the Hermitian construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of [22], [25], we proposed a decomposition of the defining set of negacyclic codes and utilized this method to construct some families of entanglement-assisted quantum MDS codes with different lengths in [6]. In [26], [27], Lü et al used the decomposition of the defining set of negacyclic codes and constacyclic codes to construct some families of entanglement-assisted quantum MDS codes respectively, and someone of those constructed quantum MDS codes have larger minimum distance with d ≥ q + 1. In [23], Liu et al constructed some new entanglement-assisted quantum MDS codes from constacyclic codes of length n = q 2 −1 r for r = 3, 5, 6, 7 and q ≡ −1 mod r. In fact, pre-shared entanglement can improve the error-correcting ability of quantum codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%