Ensemble variational assimilation for the representation of background error covariances in a high‐latitude regional model

Abstract

[1] Statistical objective analysis requires the explicit specification of the observation and background error covariances. This paper deals with the estimation of the latter within a high-latitude regional model. Four different approaches have been adopted to simulate the error evolution in the analysis and forecast steps of the model: i) the largely-adopted NMC method, applied to both a winter and a summer season data set, ii) global ensemble analyses projected forward to the 6-hour forecast range by the limited-area model itself, iii) limited-area ensemble variational assimilation with unperturbed lateral boundary conditions (LBCs) and iv) limited-area ensemble variational assimilation with perturbed lateral boundary conditions. The structure of the four background error covariance matrices was extensively compared. It turned out that the NMC-derived standard deviations had stronger amplitude at the large scales, especially in the lower troposphere, compared to those derived using the ensemble technique, and much broader horizontal and large-scale vertical correlations. The contribution of lateral boundary perturbations is shown to be significant. Moreover, neglecting these LBCs perturbations contributes to unrealistic features, such as artificial small variances near the boundaries, which tend to spuriously propagate towards the inner area. Furthermore, humidity variances and associated cross-covariances tend to be weaker in the ensemble assimilation experiments, in particular when lateral boundary conditions are not perturbed. A onemonth assimilation period allowed us to evaluate the impact of the different background error statistics on the forecasts: wind, geopotential and partly temperature are clearly benefiting from the use of ensemble-based background error covariances; humidity skill scores are noticeably improved when background error covariances from limited-area ensemble assimilation were used. The seasonality of the background error structures was also investigated, and it was found non-negligible for the performance of the data assimilation and forecast systems.Citation: Storto, A., and R. Randriamampianina (2010), Ensemble variational assimilation for the representation of background error covariances in a high-latitude regional model,

Exploring the assimilation of IASI radiances in forecasting polar lows

“…Satellite radiances are bias-corrected in accordance with the adaptive scheme of Auligné et al (2007). The background error statistics for the assimilation system were derived by downscaling global ensemble variational assimilation simulations, as described in Storto and Randriamampianina (2010b). The deterministic ECMWF analyses and forecasts were used as lateral boundary conditions.…”

Balance characteristics of multivariate background error covariances and their impact on analyses and forecasts in tropical and Arctic regions

“…Many authors have investigated different aspects of background errors in different regions, such as Sadiki et al (2000), Montmerle et al (2006), Michel and Auligne (2010). For regional analysis, it is very important to use the regional BE as it reflects the local meteorological characteristics (Storto and Randriamampianina 2010).…”

Background error covariance estimation for atmospheric CO2 data assimilation

“…The formalism of the NMC method (i.e., the analysis of increments) emphasizes the small‐scale structures in the background CO 2 , missing much of the large‐scale error patterns due to the dominant flux errors. Interestingly, this is different from NWP‐related applications, where the observation errors are the main driver for the 6–12 h background forecast errors, and it has been pointed out [e.g., Berre et al ., ; Belo Pereira and Berre , ; Storto and Randriamampianina , ] that the NMC method likely overestimates the error correlations in that context. Finally, if there is no significant seasonality in the CO 2 observational constraint, then the error statistics defined via the NMC method remain invariant in time.…”