2020
DOI: 10.1002/stc.2663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble learning‐based structural health monitoring by Mahalanobis distance metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others employ as a boundary the distance threshold from the initial observations. In the articles [12,[14][15][16] novelty detection system were implemented based on Euclidean and Mahalanobis distances as metrics. For several presented literature applications, storage of reference observations is required.…”
Section: Novelty Detection In Condition Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others employ as a boundary the distance threshold from the initial observations. In the articles [12,[14][15][16] novelty detection system were implemented based on Euclidean and Mahalanobis distances as metrics. For several presented literature applications, storage of reference observations is required.…”
Section: Novelty Detection In Condition Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim, the most relevant techniques are statistical distance measures, which may depend upon the type of damage-sensitive features to handle. Some of the useful univariate and multivariate distance techniques to mention include the Mahalanobis distance [ 20 , 21 , 22 ] and Kullback–Leibler divergence [ 15 , 23 , 24 ], dynamic time warping [ 25 ], and other damage indices based on relative errors [ 26 , 27 ], classical and robust multidimensional scaling algorithms [ 28 , 29 ], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue becomes even worse when the limited information is coupled with the environmental and/or operational variability conditions. These are deceptive effects, such as temperature fluctuations, humidity and moisture variations, wind speed, human movements, and traffic, that provide changes similar to damage in the sensed structural response and lead to an outlier masking problem [ 21 ]. In such cases, false alarms and erroneous detection results present the major challenges [ 20 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once damage-sensitive features have been extracted from the dataset, the final step of a data-driven SHM method is to analyze the features themselves for decision-making, providing outcomes in terms of early damage detection, localization, and quantification. At this stage, different techniques can be adopted, including statistical distance metrics (e.g., the Mahalanobis distance [ 23 , 24 ] or the Kullback–Leibler divergence [ 10 , 21 , 25 ]), Bayesian approaches [ 26 , 27 ], artificial neural networks [ 28 , 29 ], principal component analysis [ 30 , 31 ], and clustering [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. In spite of their applicability, they may not perform efficiently when damage-sensitive features are of a high-dimensional nature, namely in the presence of big data to process; this leads to a time-consuming and unreliable decision-making process [ 10 , 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%