2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21051646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Monitoring of Large-Scale Civil Structures: An Approach Based on Data Partitioning and Classical Multidimensional Scaling

Abstract: A major challenge in structural health monitoring (SHM) is the efficient handling of big data, namely of high-dimensional datasets, when damage detection under environmental variability is being assessed. To address this issue, a novel data-driven approach to early damage detection is proposed here. The approach is based on an efficient partitioning of the dataset, gathering the sensor recordings, and on classical multidimensional scaling (CMDS). The partitioning procedure aims at moving towards a low-dimensio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, according to Kramar's recommendation [47], the bottleneck layer should have smaller neurons than the other hidden layers. The great advantage of the auto-associative neural network is its unsupervised learning aspect and ability to remove the noise, outliers, and any variability condition in data (features) [47][48][49].…”
Section: Data Normalization By Odtl 221 Auto-associative Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, according to Kramar's recommendation [47], the bottleneck layer should have smaller neurons than the other hidden layers. The great advantage of the auto-associative neural network is its unsupervised learning aspect and ability to remove the noise, outliers, and any variability condition in data (features) [47][48][49].…”
Section: Data Normalization By Odtl 221 Auto-associative Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SHM measurements can be used to determine structural parameters with structural system identification techniques [ 11 , 12 ]. Structural system identification targets identifying the computer-based model’s parameters (such as axial or flexural stiffness) to estimate the structural response of the structure [ 13 ]. Based on the nature of the structural response and the features of the external excitation, structural system identification methods can be classified as static or dynamic [ 12 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim, the most relevant techniques are statistical distance measures, which may depend upon the type of damage-sensitive features to handle. Some of the useful univariate and multivariate distance techniques to mention include the Mahalanobis distance [ 20 , 21 , 22 ] and Kullback–Leibler divergence [ 15 , 23 , 24 ], dynamic time warping [ 25 ], and other damage indices based on relative errors [ 26 , 27 ], classical and robust multidimensional scaling algorithms [ 28 , 29 ], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%