2017 American Control Conference (ACC) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2017.7962924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble Kalman filtering for wind field estimation in wind farms

Abstract: Currently, wind farms typically rely on greedy control, in which the individual turbine's structural loading and power are optimized. However, this often appears suboptimal for the collective wind farm. A promising solution is closed-loop wind farm control using state feedback algorithms employing a dynamic model of the flow. This control method is a novelty in wind farms, and has potential to provide a temporally optimal control policy accounting for time-varying inflow conditions and unmodeled dynamics, both… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be interesting to define the mixing length for each position in the wind farm 20 separately, but this will lead to too many tuning variables. Moreover, in (Iungo et al, 2015), the authors illustrate that in a turbine's near wake the mixing length is roughly invariant for different downstream locations, but in the far wake, the mixing length increases linearly with downstream distance.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It could be interesting to define the mixing length for each position in the wind farm 20 separately, but this will lead to too many tuning variables. Moreover, in (Iungo et al, 2015), the authors illustrate that in a turbine's near wake the mixing length is roughly invariant for different downstream locations, but in the far wake, the mixing length increases linearly with downstream distance.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the objective is to do online control, i.e., it is desired to reduce 20 computational complexity, this section introduces a second WFSim representation. The first representation was given in (20) while the second is defined as:…”
Section: Computation Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea pursued in this paper is then to take a rather pragmatic approach: based on the realization that it will always be difficult -if not altogether impossible-to include all effects and all physics in a model of limited numerical complexity, a given model is corrected by unknown parametric terms, 15 which are then learnt by using operational data.The idea of improving an existing model based on measurements is hardly new, and it is actually an important topic in the areas of controls and system identification. For example, in the field of wind farm flows, a Kalman filtering approach has been proposed by Doekemeijer et al (2017) to update model predictions based on Lidar measurements. Here again the present paper takes a more pragmatic approach, and model updating is based exclusively on data provided by the standard Supervisory 20 Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems that are typically available on contemporary wind turbines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational cost may vary from 0.02 s for a small wind farm with N = 3 · 10 3 states (e.g., a 2 by 1 wind farm in Doekemeijer et al (2017)), to 1.2 s for N = 1 · 10 5 states for medium-sized wind farms (e.g., a 3 by 3 wind farm in Boersma et al (2017b)), for a single time-step forward simulation on a single desktop CPU core. This computational complexity is what motivates the use of time-efficient estimation algorithms in the work at hand, and time-efficient predictive control methods for optimization in related work .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%