2021
DOI: 10.1080/00202967.2021.1906542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing wear resistance of AISI 304 alloy with shot peening and investigation of corrosion behaviour in marine water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Çakir et al also tested austenitic steel, this time AISI 304 [ 109 ]. The samples were tested for corrosion and wear resistance with different coverage areas ranging from 100% to 1500%, and the effect of polishing after SP was examined.…”
Section: Shot Peening Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çakir et al also tested austenitic steel, this time AISI 304 [ 109 ]. The samples were tested for corrosion and wear resistance with different coverage areas ranging from 100% to 1500%, and the effect of polishing after SP was examined.…”
Section: Shot Peening Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the result of PDP curve shown in Figure 8(a). Moreover, the LSMed samples in this study display a superior corrosion resistance compared to the cold rolling 304 stainless steel with the I corr of 6.01 × 10 −6 A cm −2 52 and a comparable corrosion resistance in comparison with the wrought 304SS with the I corr of 3.84 × 10 −7 A cm −2 . 53…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The mass loss of the untreated and LSMed samples in deionised water is 35 ± 1 and 14 ± 0.3 mg, whereas the mass loss in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution is 40 ± 0.6 and 20 ± 0.3 mg after 8-h CE, respectively. The mean depth of erosion ( MDE ) and the mean depth of erosion rate ( MDER ) can be used to evaluate CE resistance and calculated as follows: 357 where Δw is the mass loss (mg), ρ is the density of the materials (g/cm 3 ), s is the eroded area (1 cm 2 in this study), Δ T is the interval time (h), MDE in μm and MDER in μm/h. The CE resistance R e (h μm −1 ) is the reciprocal of MDER.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Poisson ratio of the alloy was taken as 0.29 with the elastic modulus 193 GPa, and the contact stress was calculated according to Hertzian contact theory as 1.53 GPa and 1.75 GPa for 5 N and 7.5 N, respectively, which was done similarly by several researchers in the literature. 12,26 The normal loads were applied through a 6 mm linear sliding stroke with a 74 rpm frequency, and the total sliding distance was 13.32 m. The applied loads were selected to evaluate previous studies and understand the load effects on pitting susceptibility and tribocorrosion behavior of AISI 304, considering the Hertzian Contact Theory.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, researchers have sought to determine the corrosion and tribocorrosion behavior of stainless steel in the marine environment 9 and try to eliminate the weak sides of them by coating, 10 heat treatment, 11 and mechanical treatment. 12 Studies on AISI 304 stainless steel corrosion and tribocorrosion behaviors recently showed the importance of pitting corrosion. [13][14][15] The pitting susceptibility of AISI 304 stainless steel has been a controversial and much-disputed subject within corrosion science in the last decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%