SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1190/1.2369748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing uranium exploration through seismic methods and potential field modeling at the McArthur River mine site, Saskatchewan, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A catalyst for the survey was that previous 2D and pseudo 3D seismic surveys over the McArthur River uranium mine had shown promising results with regards to the location of the unconformity and post-Athabasca fault zones (O'Dowd et al, 2006;Hajnal et al, 2007;White et al, 2007). The primary objectives of the seismic survey over the Millenium deposit were to map the depth to the unconformity and image post-Athabasca structure within the planned mine infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A catalyst for the survey was that previous 2D and pseudo 3D seismic surveys over the McArthur River uranium mine had shown promising results with regards to the location of the unconformity and post-Athabasca fault zones (O'Dowd et al, 2006;Hajnal et al, 2007;White et al, 2007). The primary objectives of the seismic survey over the Millenium deposit were to map the depth to the unconformity and image post-Athabasca structure within the planned mine infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mineralization lies directly on top of the basement (unconformity hosted) or is located within fault zones below the unconformity (basement hosted). Historically, exploration and production has been focused in the shallower parts of the basin, but more recently, it has moved to deeper levels (Tuncer et al, 2006), with new orebodies targeted as deep as 800 m (O'Dowd et al, 2006). These unconformityrelated deposits have traditionally been explored for using EM methods (Tuncer et al, 2006) based on a graphitic conductor model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features were also identified in other geotechnical work. The lack of any strong reflectors, such as those observed in other surveys completed in the Athabasca Basin (O'Dowd et al, 2006), suggests that the sandstone is competent in the vicinity of the proposed shaft locations. A few of the side-scan reflectors are visible as offsets or discontinuities in the 3D surface cube (Figure 10), and are subparallel and hanging wall to the B 1 conductor trend.…”
Section: Seismic Surveys For Mine Planning Wc209mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In the current research of sandstone-type uranium deposits, there are some studies based on 3D seismic data [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Among them, most of the research works focus on tectonic characteristics [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current research of sandstone-type uranium deposits, there are some studies based on 3D seismic data [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Among them, most of the research works focus on tectonic characteristics [25][26][27][28]. Dentith and Randell [29] in 2003 analyzed the geophysical characteristics of the sandstone-type uranium deposits in South Australia and North America.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%