2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-017-0463-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing planned and associated biodiversity in French farming systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such cultivar mixtures that increase grain yield are easily transferable to the low‐input management systems common throughout most Asian and African crop systems (Teng et al ., ; Nankya et al ., ). The effects of cultivar mixtures on grain yield have been attributed to genetic diversity (Smithson & Lenne, ; Casagrande et al ., ), but have never been linked to kin recognition among crop cultivars. In sharp contrast to the effects of genetic diversity, kin recognition requires the homogeneity of genetic background with less diversity among co‐occurring crop cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cultivar mixtures that increase grain yield are easily transferable to the low‐input management systems common throughout most Asian and African crop systems (Teng et al ., ; Nankya et al ., ). The effects of cultivar mixtures on grain yield have been attributed to genetic diversity (Smithson & Lenne, ; Casagrande et al ., ), but have never been linked to kin recognition among crop cultivars. In sharp contrast to the effects of genetic diversity, kin recognition requires the homogeneity of genetic background with less diversity among co‐occurring crop cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tracking of on-farm innovations is a concrete approach to identifying local practices [22][23][24]. This method makes it possible to gain access to a great diversity of practices used by farmers, which is more difficult to achieve through traditional methods.…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates that farmers might prefer closed questions to open-ended questions [48], that the length of the survey might influence their willingness to answer the open questions [49] and that alternatives to written communication, such as video, are acknowledged as an efficient way to foster learning for farmers; for example, [50]. This supports the observation that farmers might be reluctant to formulate answers in written form, and might be less willing to spend a lot of time on filling in surveys.…”
Section: Familiarity With the Target Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%